Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33176833›Full record

Trial reportJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2020

Validity and sensitivity of instrumented postural and gait assessment using low-cost devices in Parkinson's disease.

Ignacio Álvarez, Jorge Latorre, Miquel Aguilar, Pau Pastor, Roberto Llorens

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical TrialValidation Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ignacio ÁlvarezFundació Docència i Recerca Mútua de Terrassa, Terrassa, Barcelona, Spain.
Jorge LatorreNeurorehabilitation and Brain Research Group, Instituto Interuniversitario de Investigación en Bioingeniería, Universitat Politècnica de València, Ciudad Politécnica de la Innovación-Building 8B-Access M-Floor 0, Camino de Vera s/n, 46022, Valencia, Spain.
Miquel AguilarFundació Docència i Recerca Mútua de Terrassa, Terrassa, Barcelona, Spain.
Pau PastorFundació Docència i Recerca Mútua de Terrassa, Terrassa, Barcelona, Spain.
Roberto LlorensNeurorehabilitation and Brain Research Group, Instituto Interuniversitario de Investigación en Bioingeniería, Universitat Politècnica de València, Ciudad Politécnica de la Innovación-Building 8B-Access M-Floor 0, Camino de Vera s/n, 46022, Valencia, Spain. rllorens@i3b.upv.es.ORCID 0000-0002-8677-8707
University Hospital Mútua de Terrassa · ESHospitales Nisa · ES

Funding

European Commission IDIFEDER/2018/029Fundació la Marató de TV3 201701-10
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAccurate assessment of balance and gait is necessary to monitor the clinical progress of Parkinson's disease (PD). Conventional clinical scales can be biased and have limited accuracy. Novel interactive devices are potentially useful to detect subtle posture or gait-related impairments.

methodsPosturographic and single and dual-task gait assessments were performed to 54 individuals with PD and 43 healthy controls with the Wii Balance Board and the Kinect v2 and the, respectively. Individuals with PD were also assessed with the Tinetti Performance Oriented Mobility Assessment, the Functional Gait Assessment and the 10-m Walking Test. The influence of demographic and clinical variables on the performance in the instrumented posturographic and gait tests, the sensitivity of these tests to the clinical condition and phenotypes, and their convergent validity with clinical scales were investigated.

resultsIndividuals with PD in H&Y I and I.5 stages showed similar performance to controls. The greatest differences in posture and gait were found between subjects in H&Y II.5 and H&Y I-I.5 stage, as well as controls. Dual-tasking enhanced the differences among all groups in gait parameters. Akinetic/rigid phenotype showed worse postural control and gait than other phenotypes. High significant correlations were found between the limits of stability and most of gait parameters with the clinical scales.

conclusionsLow-cost devices showed potential to objectively quantify posture and gait in established PD (H&Y ≥ II). Dual-tasking gait evaluation was more sensitive to detect differences among PD stages and compared to controls than free gait. Gait and posture were more impaired in akinetic/rigid PD.

Indexed as

AgedFemaleGait AnalysisGait Disorders, NeurologicHumansMaleMiddle AgedParkinson DiseasePostural BalanceGaitKinectParkinson’s diseasePostureWii balance board

Identifiers

PMID33176833
PMCPMC7656721
OpenAlexW3103209288

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.