Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33176799›Full record

ArticleMalaria journal2020

Rural-urban variation in insecticide-treated net utilization among pregnant women: evidence from 2018 Nigeria Demographic and Health Survey.

Edward Kwabena Ameyaw, Kenneth Setorwu Adde, Shadrach Dare, Sanni Yaya

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Malaria journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Impact of Insecticide-Treated Nets onTropical medicine and infectious disease · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Edward Kwabena AmeyawSchool of Public Health, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia. edmeyaw19@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6617-237X
Kenneth Setorwu AddeDepartment of Population and Health, College of Humanities and Legal Studies, University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast, Ghana.
Shadrach DareMother and Infant Research Unit, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.
Sanni YayaSchool of International Development and Global Studies, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
Global Affairs Canada · CAUniversity of Cape Coast · GHUniversity of Dundee · GBUniversity of Technology Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn 2018, Nigeria accounted for the highest prevalence of malaria worldwide. Pregnant women and children under five years bear the highest risk of malaria. Geographical factors affect utilization of insecticide-treated nets (ITN), yet existing literature have paid little attention to the rural-urban dimension of ITN utilization in Nigeria. This study aimed at investigating the rural-urban variation in ITN utilization among pregnant women in Nigeria using data from the 2018 Demographic and Health Survey.

methodsA total of 2909 pregnant women were included in the study. The prevalence of ITN utilization for rural and urban pregnant women of Nigeria were presented with descriptive statistics. Chi-square test was employed to assess the association between residence, socio-demographic characteristics and ITN utilization at 95% level of significance. Subsequently, binary logistic regression was used to assess the influence of residence on ITN utilization.

resultsEight out of ten of the rural residents utilized ITN (86.1%) compared with 74.1% among urban residents. Relative to urban pregnant women, those in rural Nigeria had higher odds of utilizing ITNs both in the crude [cOR = 2.17, CI = 1.66-2.84] and adjusted models [aOR = 1.18, CI = 1.05-1.24]. Pregnant women aged 40-44 had lower odds of ITN utilization compared to those aged 15-19 [aOR = 0.63, CI = 0.44-0.92]. Poorer pregnant women had higher odds of ITN utilization compared with poorest pregnant women [aOR = 1.09, CI = 1.04-1.32]. Across regions, those in the south [aOR = 0.26, CI = 0.14-0.49] and south-west [aOR = 0.29, CI = 0.16-0.54] had lower odds of ITN use compared to their counterparts in the north-west region.

conclusionThe high use of ITNs among pregnant women in Nigeria may be due to the prioritization of rural communities by previous interventions. This is a dimension worth considering to enhance the attainment of the national anti-malarial initiatives. Since possession of ITN is not a guarantee for utilization, women in urban locations need constant reminder of ITN use through messages delivered at ANC and radio advertisements. Moreover, subsequent mass ITN campaigns ought to take cognizance of variations ITN use across regions and pragmatic steps be taken to increase the availability of ITN in households since there is a moderately high use in households with at least one ITN in Nigeria.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultFemaleHumansInsecticide-Treated BednetsMosquito ControlNigeriaPregnancyRural PopulationUrban PopulationYoung AdultInsecticide treated netITNMalariaMaternal healthNigeriaPregnant women

Identifiers

PMID33176799
PMCPMC7659074
OpenAlexW3105331717

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.