ArticleJournal of nanobiotechnology2020
A microfluidic platform for in situ investigation of biofilm formation and its treatment under controlled conditions.
Article in Journal of nanobiotechnology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
36 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.
- Harnessing microfluidics for microbiology: from bacteria-host interactions to emerging cancer therapies.Communications biology · 2026Review
- A Biomimetic Microfluidic Triple-compartment Periodontium-on-chip for Investigation of Inflammatory Responses in Periodontitis.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026Article
- Fungal-Bacterial Interactions in Polymicrobial Infections: Hidden Threats.MicrobiologyOpen · 2026Review
- Organ-on-chip (OoC) and nano-biomaterials: next generation of precision oral and dental healthcare research.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2026Review
- Exploring the anti-biofilm effect of darobactin B and colistin in static and dynamic environments.Microbiology spectrum · 2026Article
- Cell Adhesion and Biofilm Development via Force-Sensitive Mechanisms: A Perspective.ACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2026Review
- Decoding the spatiotemporal heterogeneity of bacterial virulence gene expression using single-cell approaches.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
- Microfluidics to Meet Antibiotic Resistance: A Growing Research Frontier.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- A Scalable Microfluidic Platform for Bacterial Cellulose Production and Characterization.ACS omega · 2025Article
- Virulence arresting drug discovery by strategies targeting bacterial virulence: Mainly focusing on quorum-sensing interference and biofilm inhibition.Journal of pharmaceutical analysis · 2025Review
- Systematic Review on the Role of Microfluidic Platforms in Advancing Scalable and Precise Microbial Bioprocessing.Engineering in life sciences · 2025Review
- Fabrication and Application of a Microfluidic Chip for Biofilm Cultivation and Analysis under Controlled Flow.ACS omega · 2025Article
- Review
- Effect of host microenvironment and bacterial lifestyles on antimicrobial sensitivity and implications for susceptibility testing.npj antimicrobials and resistance · 2025Review
- Resolving spatiotemporal dynamics in bacterial multicellular populations: approaches and challenges.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2025Review
- Bioelectronic Delivery of Potassium Ions Controls Membrane Voltage and Growth Dynamics in Bacteria Biofilms.Biomedical materials & devices (New York, N.Y.) · 2025Article
- Integration of three-dimensional multicolor holography with microfluidic three-dimensional biofilm-on-a-chip technology for advancing the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers: An innovation in phage therapy.Journal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences · 2025Article
- Microfluidic biosensors for biomarker detection in body fluids: a key approach for early cancer diagnosis.Biomarker research · 2024Review
- A Microfluidic Design for Quantitative Measurements of Shear Stress-Dependent Adhesion and Motion ofBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Microfluidic Platform with Precisely Controlled Hydrodynamic Parameters and Integrated Features for Generation of Microvortices to Accurately Form and Monitor Biofilms in Flow.ACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundStudying bacterial adhesion and early biofilm development is crucial for understanding the physiology of sessile bacteria and forms the basis for the development of novel antimicrobial biomaterials. Microfluidics technologies can be applied in such studies since they permit dynamic real-time analysis and a more precise control of relevant parameters compared to traditional static and flow chamber assays. In this work, we aimed to establish a microfluidic platform that permits real-time observation of bacterial adhesion and biofilm formation under precisely controlled homogeneous laminar flow conditions.
resultsUsing Escherichia coli as the model bacterial strain, a microfluidic platform was developed to overcome several limitations of conventional microfluidics such as the lack of spatial control over bacterial colonization and allow label-free observation of bacterial proliferation at single-cell resolution. This platform was applied to demonstrate the influence of culture media on bacterial colonization and the consequent eradication of sessile bacteria by antibiotic. As expected, the nutrient-poor medium (modified M9 minimal medium) was found to promote bacterial adhesion and to enable a higher adhesion rate compared to the nutrient-rich medium (tryptic soy broth rich medium ). However, in rich medium the adhered cells colonized the glass surface faster than those in poor medium under otherwise identical conditions. For the first time, this effect was demonstrated to be caused by a higher retention of newly generated bacteria in the rich medium, rather than faster growth especially during the initial adhesion phase. These results also indicate that higher adhesion rate does not necessarily lead to faster biofilm formation. Antibiotic treatment of sessile bacteria with colistin was further monitored by fluorescence microscopy at single-cell resolution, allowing in situ analysis of killing efficacy of antimicrobials.
conclusionThe platform established here represents a powerful and versatile tool for studying environmental effects such as medium composition on bacterial adhesion and biofilm formation. Our microfluidic setup shows great potential for the in vitro assessment of new antimicrobials and antifouling agents under flow conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.