Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33176767›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2020

Comparative effectiveness of long-term acute care hospital versus skilled nursing facility transfer.

Anil N Makam, Oanh Kieu Nguyen, Michael E Miller, Sachin J Shah, Kandice A Kapinos, Ethan A Halm

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Anil N MakamDepartment of Internal Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA. anil.makam@ucsf.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7072-9946
Oanh Kieu NguyenDepartment of Internal Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Michael E MillerDepartment of Population and Data Sciences, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Sachin J ShahDivision of Hospital Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, USA.
Kandice A KapinosDepartment of Internal Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Ethan A HalmDepartment of Internal Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.

Funding

VARC CoreP30AG044281 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Louise C. Walter · 2013 to 2026
$19.9M
Post-Acute Care in the Elderly: the Role of Long-Term Acute Care HospitalsK23AG052603 · NIA · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI MAKAM, ANIL NAGA · 2016 to 2021
$1.1M
Addressing Social Vulnerabilities to Prevent Hospital Readmissions in Adults with Cardiovascular DiseaseK23HL133441 · NHLBI · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI NGUYEN, OANH KIEU · 2017 to 2021
$932k
Role of Long-Term Acute Care HospitalsR03AG053291 · NIA · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI HALM, ETHAN A · 2016 to 2017
$243k
AHRQ HHS R24 HS022418NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL133441NHLBI NIH HHS K23HL133441NIA NIH HHS K23 AG052603NIA NIH HHS K23AG052603NIA NIH HHS P30 AG044281NIA NIH HHS R03 AG053291NIA NIH HHS R03AG053291
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLong-term acute care hospital (LTACH) use varies considerably across the U.S., which may reflect uncertainty about the effectiveness of LTACHs vs. skilled nursing facilities (SNF), the principal post-acute care alternative. Given that LTACHs provide more intensive care and thus receive over triple the reimbursement of SNFs for comparable diagnoses, we sought to compare outcomes and spending between LTACH versus SNF transfer.

methodsUsing Medicare claims linked to electronic health record (EHR) data from six Texas Hospitals between 2009 and 2010, we conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients hospitalized on a medicine service in a high-LTACH use region and discharged to either an LTACH or SNF and followed for one year. The primary outcomes included mortality, 60-day recovery without inpatient care, days at home, and healthcare spending

resultsOf 3503 patients, 18% were transferred to an LTACH. Patients transferred to LTACHs were younger (median 71 vs. 82 years), less likely to be female (50.5 vs 66.6%) and white (69.0 vs. 84.1%), but were sicker (24.3 vs. 14.2% for prolonged intensive care unit stay; median diagnosis resource intensity weight of 2.03 vs. 1.38). In unadjusted analyses, patients transferred to an LTACH vs. SNF were less likely to survive (59.1 vs. 65.0%) or recover (62.5 vs 66.0%), and spent fewer days at home (186 vs. 200). Adjusting for demographic and clinical confounders available in Medicare claims and EHR data, LTACH transfer was not significantly associated with differences in mortality (HR, 1.12, 95% CI, 0.94-1.33), recovery (SHR, 1.07, 0.93-1.23), and days spent at home (IRR, 0.96, 0.83-1.10), but was associated with greater Medicare spending ($16,689 for one year, 95% CI, $12,216-$21,162).

conclusionLTACH transfer for Medicare beneficiaries is associated with similar clinical outcomes but with higher healthcare spending compared to SNF transfer. LTACH use should be reserved for patients who require complex inpatient care and cannot be cared for in SNFs.

Indexed as

MedicareSkilled Nursing FacilitiesAgedFemaleHospitalsHumansPatient DischargePatient ReadmissionRetrospective StudiesTexasUnited StatesComparative effectivenessMedicareOlder adultsPost-acute careSkilled nursing facility

Identifiers

PMID33176767
PMCPMC7656509

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.