Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33176742›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2020

Two communities, one highway and the fight for clean air: the role of political history in shaping community engagement and environmental health research translation.

Linda Sprague Martinez, Noelle Dimitri, Sharon Ron, Neelakshi Hudda, Wig Zamore, Lydia Lowe, Ben Echevarria, John L Durant, Doug Brugge, Ellin Reisner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. An Evaluation of an Environmental Health Infographic in Community Settings.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Linda Sprague MartinezMacro Department, Boston University School of Social Work, Boston, MA, 02215, USA. lsmarti@bu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5070-7640
Noelle DimitriBoston University School of Social Work, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8268-1433
Sharon RonMetropolitan Area Planning Council, Boston, MA, 02111, USA.
Neelakshi HuddaDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Tufts University, Medford, MA, 02155, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2886-5458
Wig ZamoreSomerville Transportation Equity Partnership, Somerville, MA, 02145, USA.
Lydia LoweThe Chinatown Land Trust, Boston, MA, 02111, USA.
Ben EchevarriaThe Welcome Project, Somerville, MA, 02145, USA.
John L DurantDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Tufts University, Medford, MA, 02155, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7016-1622
Doug BruggeDepartment of Public Health Sciences, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, CT, 06030, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6812-2720
Ellin ReisnerSomerville Transportation Equity Partnership, Somerville, MA, 02145, USA.

Funding

HAFTRAP-Home Air Filtration for Traffic-Related Air PollutionR01ES030289 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT SCH OF MED/DNT · PI BRUGGE, DOUG · 2019 to 2024
$2.5M
NEAR Highway Pollution: From Research to ActionR01ES026980 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT SCH OF MED/DNT · PI BRUGGE, DOUG, REISNER, ELLIN · 2016 to 2020
$2.2M
NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES026980NIEHS NIH HHS R01ES026980NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES030289NIEHS NIH HHS R01ES030289
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis paper explores strategies to engage community stakeholders in efforts to address the effects of traffic-related air pollution (TRAP). Communities of color and low-income communities are disproportionately impacted by environmental threats including emissions generated by major roadways.

methodsQualitative instrumental case study design was employed to examine how community-level factors in two Massachusetts communities, the City of Somerville and Boston's Chinatown neighborhood, influence the translation of research into practice to address TRAP exposure. Guided by the Interactive Systems Framework (ISF), we drew on three data sources: key informant interviews, observations and document reviews. Thematic analysis was used.

resultsFindings indicate political history plays a significant role in shaping community action. In Somerville, community organizers worked with city and state officials, and embraced community development strategies to engage residents. In contrast, Chinatown community activists focused on immediate resident concerns including housing and resident displacement resulting in more opposition to local municipal leadership.

conclusionsThe ISF was helpful in informing the team's thinking related to systems and structures needed to translate research to practice. However, although municipal stakeholders are increasingly sympathetic to and aware of the health impacts of TRAP, there was not a local legislative or regulatory precedent on how to move some of the proposed TRAP-related policies into practice. As such, we found that pairing the ISF with a community organizing framework may serve as a useful approach for examining the dynamic relationship between science, community engagement and environmental research translation. Social workers and public health professionals can advance TRAP exposure mitigation by exploring the political and social context of communities and working to bridge research and community action.

Indexed as

Community ParticipationEnvironmental HealthCitiesHousingHumansMassachusettsCommunity based participatory researchPublic health actionTraffic related air pollution (TRAP); research and action

Identifiers

PMID33176742
PMCPMC7656715

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.