ArticleBMC bioinformatics2020
Performance of copy number variants detection based on whole-genome sequencing by DNBSEQ platforms.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- ML-ExonCNV: a robust XGBoost multi-expert ensemble framework for rare exon CNV detection in whole-exome sequencing data.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Energy metabolism alteration and gene expression reprogramming in a cell model of high fat load non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.BMC gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Genetic risk assessment of pregnancy-associated venous thromboembolism: dual utility of maternal peripheral blood in NIPT and VTE evaluation.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Article
- Article
- Performance evaluation of structural variation detection using DNBSEQ whole-genome sequencing.BMC genomics · 2025Article
- Optimizing sequence data analysis using convolution neural network for the prediction of CNV bait positions.BMC bioinformatics · 2024Article
- Comprehensive assessment of long-read sequencing platforms and calling algorithms for detection of copy number variation.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Article
- Genome-Wide Transcriptome Profiling Reveals the Mechanisms Underlying Hepatic Metabolism under Different Raising Systems in Yak.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024Article
- Comprehensive Genetic Analysis Unraveled the Missing Heritability in a Chinese Cohort With Wolfram Syndrome 1: Clinical and Genetic Findings.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2022Article
- Transcriptome Comparison Reveals the Difference in Liver Fat Metabolism between Different Sheep Breeds.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022Article
- Transcriptome analysis identifies putative genes involved in triterpenoid biosynthesis in Platycodon grandiflorus.Planta · 2021Article
- Comparison between MGI and Illumina sequencing platforms for whole genome sequencing.Genes & genomics · 2021Article
- Transcriptome analysis of peach seedlings (Science progressArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDNBSEQ™ platforms are new massively parallel sequencing (MPS) platforms that use DNA nanoball technology. Use of data generated from DNBSEQ™ platforms to detect single nucleotide variants (SNVs) and small insertions and deletions (indels) has proven to be quite effective, while the feasibility of copy number variants (CNVs) detection is unclear.
resultsHere, we first benchmarked different CNV detection tools based on Illumina whole-genome sequencing (WGS) data of NA12878 and then assessed these tools in CNV detection based on DNBSEQ™ sequencing data from the same sample. When the same tool was used, the CNVs detected based on DNBSEQ™ and Illumina data were similar in quantity, length and distribution, while great differences existed within results from different tools and even based on data from a single platform. We further estimated the CNV detection power based on available CNV benchmarks of NA12878 and found similar precision and sensitivity between the DNBSEQ™ and Illumina platforms. We also found higher precision of CNVs shorter than 1 kbp based on DNBSEQ™ platforms than those based on Illumina platforms by using Pindel, DELLY and LUMPY. We carefully compared these two available benchmarks and found a large proportion of specific CNVs between them. Thus, we constructed a more complete CNV benchmark of NA12878 containing 3512 CNV regions.
conclusionsWe assessed and benchmarked CNV detections based on WGS with DNBSEQ™ platforms and provide guidelines for future studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.