Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33176110›Full record

ReviewAmerican journal of physiology. Cell physiology2021

Vessel-on-a-chip models for studying microvascular physiology, transport, and function in vitro.

Savannah R Moses, Jonathan J Adorno, Andre F Palmer, Jonathan W Song

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in American journal of physiology. Cell physiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Exploiting Device Deformability for Fluid and Particle Manipulation.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Design strategy primer for organ-on-chips.Biomaterials translational · 2025
    Article
  16. A critical review onFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Savannah R MosesDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
Jonathan J AdornoDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
Andre F PalmerDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
Jonathan W SongDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.ORCID 0000-0002-6991-5298
The Ohio State University · US

Funding

Biophysical-based approach for controlling blood vessel structure and functionR01HL141941 · NHLBI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI CASTRO, CARLOS E., PRAKASH, SHAURYA · 2018 to 2021
$2.0M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL141941U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) W81XWH1810059
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To understand how the microvasculature grows and remodels, researchers require reproducible systems that emulate the function of living tissue. Innovative contributions toward fulfilling this important need have been made by engineered microvessels assembled in vitro with microfabrication techniques. Microfabricated vessels, commonly referred to as "vessels-on-a-chip," are from a class of cell culture technologies that uniquely integrate microscale flow phenomena, tissue-level biomolecular transport, cell-cell interactions, and proper three-dimensional (3-D) extracellular matrix environments under well-defined culture conditions. Here, we discuss the enabling attributes of microfabricated vessels that make these models more physiological compared with established cell culture techniques and the potential of these models for advancing microvascular research. This review highlights the key features of microvascular transport and physiology, critically discusses the strengths and limitations of different microfabrication strategies for studying the microvasculature, and provides a perspective on current challenges and future opportunities for vessel-on-a-chip models.

Indexed as

Lab-On-A-Chip DevicesAnimalsBiological TransportCapillary PermeabilityCell Culture TechniquesCells, CulturedCellular MicroenvironmentHumansMicrofluidic Analytical TechniquesMicrovesselsModels, CardiovascularNeovascularization, PhysiologicSignal TransductionVascular Remodelingangiogenesiscellular microenvironmentmicrofluidicstissue microfabricationvascular remodeling

Identifiers

PMID33176110
PMCPMC7846973
OpenAlexW3103606383

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.