Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33176108›Full record

ArticlePublic health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974)

Gaps in Knowledge About COVID-19 Among US Residents Early in the Outbreak.

Lauren A McCormack, Linda Squiers, Alicia M Frasier, Molly Lynch, Carla M Bann, Pia D M MacDonald

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Low income and health literacy: a systematic scoping review.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. How Are Perceived Ambiguity and Risk Beliefs Related? Evidence From Longitudinal and Daily Diary Data.Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. COVID-19 Study on Scientific Articles in Health Communication: A Science Mapping Analysis in Web of Science.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  12. "Frontiers in health services · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. [Social inequalities in the regional spread of SARS-CoV-2 infections].Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lauren A McCormack6856 RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5362-0540
Linda Squiers6856 RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
Alicia M Frasier6856 RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
Molly Lynch6856 RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
Carla M Bann6856 RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
Pia D M MacDonald6856 RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) resulting from severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 began to affect the United States in early 2020. This study aimed to assess the US public's initial understanding about the disease and virus to inform public health communication efforts.

methodsWe conducted a survey of US households from February 28 through March 2, 2020, using a probability-based web-panel survey of 1021 US residents. To assess knowledge about COVID-19, we asked respondents a series of 16 true/false questions. We conducted descriptive statistics and linear regression analyses to examine differences in knowledge scores based on demographic and background characteristics.

resultsKnowledge about COVID-19 and the virus was relatively low overall at the beginning of the outbreak, with average scores of 62% on a 16-item knowledge index (ie, answers for 6 of the 16 questions were incorrect or unknown). Knowledge was especially low among people who had low education and income levels, were unemployed, were Hispanic, were non-Hispanic Black, were aged 18-24 and 35-49, indicated having "other" health insurance, and had limited exposure to information about the pandemic. Non-Hispanic Black respondents were less knowledgeable about COVID-19 and the virus at every education level compared with non-Hispanic White respondents at higher education levels. Non-Hispanic Black respondents with <high school degree were the least knowledgeable of all subgroups.

conclusionsThe findings of our study highlight the need for widespread, ongoing public health education about the virus and COVID-19, especially among certain populations. It is critical to effectively translate complex clinical and epidemiologic evidence into messages that most people can understand and act on during a pandemic, that combat misinformation about the virus and COVID-19, and that consider low levels of health literacy.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAge FactorsCOVID-19FemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth LiteracyHumansMaleMiddle AgedPandemicsResidence CharacteristicsSARS-CoV-2Sex FactorsSocioeconomic FactorsCOVID-19disparitiesemerging infectious diseasepandemicpublic health communicationpublic understanding of science

Identifiers

PMID33176108
PMCPMC7856374

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.