Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33175915›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Flow in the time of COVID-19: Findings from China.

Kate Sweeny, Kyla Rankin, Xiaorong Cheng, Lulu Hou, Fangfang Long, Yao Meng, Lilian Azer, Renlai Zhou, Weiwei Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Psychological Responses of Hungarian Students during the First Wave of the COVID-19 Pandemic.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Americans' distress early in the COVID-19 pandemic: Protective resources and coping strategies.Psychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy · 2021
    Article
  12. Reply to Marot et al.: The struggle to comply with social-distancing is multifaceted, as are the ways of mitigating it.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Is It Possible to Find Something Positive in Being Confined Due to COVID-19? Implications for Well-Being.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Kate SweenyDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Riverside, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-6653-422X
Kyla RankinDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Riverside, California, United States of America.
Xiaorong ChengSchool of Psychology, Central China Normal University, Wuhan, China.
Lulu HouDepartment of Psychology, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Fangfang LongDepartment of Psychology, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Yao MengDepartment of Psychology, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Lilian AzerDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Riverside, California, United States of America.
Renlai ZhouDepartment of Psychology, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Weiwei ZhangDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Riverside, California, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In February 2020, the Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19) was raging in Wuhan, China and quickly spreading to the rest of the world. This period was fraught with uncertainty for those in the affected areas. The present investigation examined the role of two potential coping resources during this stressful period of uncertainty: flow and mindfulness. Participants in Wuhan and other major cities affected by COVID-19 (N = 5115) completed an online survey assessing subjective experiences of flow, mindfulness, and well-being. Longer quarantine was associated with poorer well-being; flow and mindfulness were associated with better well-being on some measures. However, flow-but not mindfulness-moderated the link between quarantine length and well-being, such that people who experienced high levels flow showed little or no association between quarantine length and poorer well-being. These findings suggest that experiencing flow (typically by engaging in flow-inducing activities) may be a particularly effective way to protect against potentially deleterious effects of a period of quarantine.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PsychologicalAdolescentAdultBetacoronavirusChinaCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19EmotionsFemaleHealth BehaviorHumansMaleMindfulnessPandemicsPneumonia, ViralQuarantine

Identifiers

PMID33175915
PMCPMC7657532

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.