SynthesisPloS one2020
The experiences of adult heart, lung, and heart-lung transplantation recipients: A systematic review of qualitative research evidence.
Synthesis in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Identifying and understanding the health-related quality of life outcomes experienced by solid organ transplant recipients: a systematic review of qualitative research.Journal of patient-reported outcomes · 2026Pooled it
- Psychological distress and self-psychological adjustment methods of lung transplant recipients: an overview of systematic reviews.BMC psychology · 2025Pooled it
- Post-Heart Transplant Changes and Perceived Donor-Recipient Correspondences: A Scoping Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Article
- Kinesiophobia, Physical Limitations and Psychological Distress as Barriers to Physical Activity in Heart Transplantation Patients: A Qualitative Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Fatigue, Sleep Problems, and Self-Efficacy Before and After Heart Transplantation: A 5 Year Follow-Up.Clinical transplantation · 2025Article
- Neurocognitive outcomes and memory transfer in heart transplantation.Global cardiology science & practice · 2025Review
- Care of Adult Heart Transplant Recipients by the Primary Care Provider: A Practical Roadmap.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Comparative analysis of quality of life in solid organ transplant recipients: the influence of skin cancer.Archives of dermatological research · 2025Article
- Transplant Journeys in Canada: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Transplant Patients, Caregivers, and Donors.Journal of patient experience · 2025Article
- Experiences, perceptions and unexpressed needs of patients undergoing heart and lung transplantation in intensive care unit: a qualitative phenomenological study.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- Quality of life and its association with predictors in lung transplant recipients: a latent profile analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- Prevention and Rehabilitation After Heart Transplantation: A Clinical Consensus Statement of the European Association of Preventive Cardiology, Heart Failure Association of the ESC, and the European Cardio Thoracic Transplant Association, a Section of ESOT.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2024Article
- Organizational challenges for partial heart transplantation.Future cardiology · 2024Review
- Design and evaluation of a Mobile-Based decision support system to enhance lung transplant candidate assessment and management: knowledge translation integrated with clinical workflow.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2023Article
- Expectations of patients awaiting lung transplantation: A qualitative study.Nursing open · 2023Article
- Patient Experiences and Perspectives of Their Decision-Making to Accept Lung Transplantation Referral: A Qualitative Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- Health-related quality of life and psychological indicators of thriving 15-19 years after heart or lung transplantation.Clinical transplantation · 2022Article
- Emerging Paradigms in Bioengineering the Lungs.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Usability preferences of people living with cystic fibrosis about a lung transplant education website.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo review evidence about the experience of being the recipient of a donated heart, lungs, or heart and lungs.
designA systematic review (registered with PROSPERO: CRD42017067218), in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. DATA SOURCES: Seven databases and Google Scholar were searched in May 2017 and July 2019 for papers reporting English-language research that had used qualitative methods to investigate experiences of adult recipients. REVIEW
methodsQuality was assessed and results were analysed thematically.
results24 papers (reporting 20 studies) were eligible and included. Their results were organised into three chronological periods: pre-transplant (encompassing the themes of 'dynamic psychosocial impact', 'resources and support'), transplant ('The Call', 'intensive care unit'), and post-transplant ('dynamic psychosocial impact', 'management', 'rejection'). Sub-themes were also identified. It was evident that contemplating and accepting listing for transplantation entailed or amplified realisation of the precipitating illness's existential threat. The period surrounding transplantation surgery was marked by profound, often surreal, experiences. Thereafter, although life usually improved, it incorporated unforeseen challenges. The transplantation clinic remained important to the recipient. The meaning of the clinic and its staff could be both reassuring (providing care and support) and threatening (representing onerous medical requirements and potential organ rejection).
conclusionThis review has implications for the psychosocial care of transplant recipients and indicates the need for further research to gain insight into the experience of receiving a donated heart and/or lung. IMPACT: Medical consequences of heart and lung transplantation are well documented; this is the first systematic review of research using qualitative methods to investigate the experience of heart, lung, and heart-and-lung transplantation. The psychosocial impact of transplantation was found to be dynamic and complex, with notable features evident before, during, and after transplantation. Clinic staff remained significant to recipients. It is clear that recipients need continuing psychosocial as well as medical support.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.