Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33175838›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2020

Machine learning assisted intraoperative assessment of brain tumor margins using HRMAS NMR spectroscopy.

Doruk Cakmakci, Emin Onur Karakaslar, Elisa Ruhland, Marie-Pierre Chenard, Francois Proust, Martial Piotto, Izzie Jacques Namer, A Ercument Cicek

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Use of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) to Study Cancer Metabolism.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Doruk CakmakciComputer Engineering Department, Bilkent University, Ankara, Turkey.
Emin Onur KarakaslarComputer Engineering Department, Bilkent University, Ankara, Turkey.
Elisa RuhlandMNMS Platform, University Hospitals of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Marie-Pierre ChenardDepartment of Pathology, University Hospitals of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Francois ProustDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospitals of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Martial PiottoBruker Biospin, Wissembourg, France.ORCID 0000-0002-6784-2670
Izzie Jacques NamerMNMS Platform, University Hospitals of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.ORCID 0000-0003-1822-7759
A Ercument CicekComputer Engineering Department, Bilkent University, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-8613-6619
Bilkent University · TRUniversité de Strasbourg · FRBruker (France) · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Complete resection of the tumor is important for survival in glioma patients. Even if the gross total resection was achieved, left-over micro-scale tissue in the excision cavity risks recurrence. High Resolution Magic Angle Spinning Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (HRMAS NMR) technique can distinguish healthy and malign tissue efficiently using peak intensities of biomarker metabolites. The method is fast, sensitive and can work with small and unprocessed samples, which makes it a good fit for real-time analysis during surgery. However, only a targeted analysis for the existence of known tumor biomarkers can be made and this requires a technician with chemistry background, and a pathologist with knowledge on tumor metabolism to be present during surgery. Here, we show that we can accurately perform this analysis in real-time and can analyze the full spectrum in an untargeted fashion using machine learning. We work on a new and large HRMAS NMR dataset of glioma and control samples (n = 565), which are also labeled with a quantitative pathology analysis. Our results show that a random forest based approach can distinguish samples with tumor cells and controls accurately and effectively with a median AUC of 85.6% and AUPR of 93.4%. We also show that we can further distinguish benign and malignant samples with a median AUC of 87.1% and AUPR of 96.1%. We analyze the feature (peak) importance for classification to interpret the results of the classifier. We validate that known malignancy biomarkers such as creatine and 2-hydroxyglutarate play an important role in distinguishing tumor and normal cells and suggest new biomarker regions. The code is released at http://github.com/ciceklab/HRMAS_NC.

Indexed as

Machine LearningMargins of ExcisionAlgorithmsBiopsyBrain NeoplasmsCohort StudiesGliomaHumansIntraoperative PeriodMagnetic Resonance Spectroscopy

Identifiers

PMID33175838
PMCPMC7682900
OpenAlexW3100592754

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.