ArticlePLoS computational biology2020
Machine learning assisted intraoperative assessment of brain tumor margins using HRMAS NMR spectroscopy.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Revolutionizing spinal interventions: a systematic review of artificial intelligence technology applications in contemporary surgery.BMC surgery · 2024Pooled it
- Use of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) to Study Cancer Metabolism.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026Review
- Towards non-invasive diagnosis of glioblastoma: identifying metabolic biomarkers in liquid biopsies using a ROC-based approach.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence for Patient Safety and Surgical Education in Neurosurgery.JMA journal · 2025Review
- Metabolite profiles of medulloblastoma for rapid and non-invasive detection of molecular disease groups.EBioMedicine · 2024Article
- Machine Learning in Neurosurgery: Toward Complex Inputs, Actionable Predictions, and Generalizable Translations.Cureus · 2024Review
- Advances in Intraoperative Glioma Tissue Sampling and Infiltration Assessment.Brain sciences · 2023Review
- PiDeeL: metabolic pathway-informed deep learning model for survival analysis and pathological classification of gliomas.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2023Article
- Advances in the intraoperative delineation of malignant glioma margin.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Review
- Nuclear-medicine probes: Where we are and where we are going.Medical physics · 2022Review
- Applications of Artificial Intelligence Based on Medical Imaging in Glioma: Current State and Future Challenges.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Review
- The future of artificial intelligence in neurosurgery: A narrative review.Surgical neurology international · 2022Review
- Machine Learning in Neuro-Oncology, Epilepsy, Alzheimer's Disease, and Schizophrenia.Acta neurochirurgica. Supplement · 2022Review
- Intraoperative tissue classification methods in orthopedic and neurological surgeries: A systematic review.Frontiers in surgery · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Complete resection of the tumor is important for survival in glioma patients. Even if the gross total resection was achieved, left-over micro-scale tissue in the excision cavity risks recurrence. High Resolution Magic Angle Spinning Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (HRMAS NMR) technique can distinguish healthy and malign tissue efficiently using peak intensities of biomarker metabolites. The method is fast, sensitive and can work with small and unprocessed samples, which makes it a good fit for real-time analysis during surgery. However, only a targeted analysis for the existence of known tumor biomarkers can be made and this requires a technician with chemistry background, and a pathologist with knowledge on tumor metabolism to be present during surgery. Here, we show that we can accurately perform this analysis in real-time and can analyze the full spectrum in an untargeted fashion using machine learning. We work on a new and large HRMAS NMR dataset of glioma and control samples (n = 565), which are also labeled with a quantitative pathology analysis. Our results show that a random forest based approach can distinguish samples with tumor cells and controls accurately and effectively with a median AUC of 85.6% and AUPR of 93.4%. We also show that we can further distinguish benign and malignant samples with a median AUC of 87.1% and AUPR of 96.1%. We analyze the feature (peak) importance for classification to interpret the results of the classifier. We validate that known malignancy biomarkers such as creatine and 2-hydroxyglutarate play an important role in distinguishing tumor and normal cells and suggest new biomarker regions. The code is released at http://github.com/ciceklab/HRMAS_NC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.