ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2020
The risk of adverse clinical outcomes following treatment of Plasmodium vivax malaria with and without primaquine in Papua, Indonesia.
Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Risk perceptions of high-dose primaquine and tafenoquine amongBMJ global health · 2026Article
- High-dose, short-course primaquine after point-of-care G6PD testing for the radical cure ofThe Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2026Article
- Article
- Malaria morbidity, mortality and associated costs in Indonesia: analysis of the National Health Insurance claim dataset.BMJ global health · 2025Article
- Linked-evidence modelling of qualitative G6PD testing to inform low- and intermediate-dose primaquine treatment for radical cure of Plasmodium vivax.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2024Article
- Radical cure for Plasmodium vivax malaria after G6PD qualitative testing in four provinces in Cambodia, results from Phase I implementation.Malaria journal · 2024Article
- A systematic analysis of the human immune response to Plasmodium vivax.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2023Article
- Severe Hemolysis during Primaquine Radical Cure of Plasmodium vivax Malaria: Two Systematic Reviews and Individual Patient Data Descriptive Analyses.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2023Article
- The history and current epidemiology of malaria in Kalimantan, Indonesia.Malaria journal · 2022Review
- Active Pharmacovigilance for Primaquine Radical Cure of Plasmodium vivax Malaria in Odisha, India.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2022Article
- The prevention and treatment of Plasmodium vivax malaria.PLoS medicine · 2021Article
- Genetic Variation ofFrontiers in pharmacology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
Abstract
The widespread use of primaquine (PQ) radical cure for P. vivax, is constrained by concerns over its safety. We used routinely collected patient data to compare the overall morbidity and mortality in patients treated with and without PQ without prior testing of Glucose-6-Phosphate-Dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency in Papua, Indonesia, where there is a low prevalence of G6PD deficiency. Records were collated from patients older than 1 year, with P. vivax infection, who were treated with an artemisinin combination therapy (ACT). The risks of re-presentation, hospitalization, major fall in haemoglobin and death within 30 days were quantified and compared between patients treated with and without PQ using a Cox regression model. In total 26,216 patients with P. vivax malaria presented to the hospital with malaria during the study period. Overall 27.56% (95% Confidence Interval (95%CI): 26.96-28.16) of 21,344 patients treated with PQ re-presented with any illness within 30 days and 1.69% (1.51-1.88) required admission to hospital. The corresponding risks were higher in the 4,872 patients not treated with PQ; Adjusted Hazard Ratio (AHR) = 0.84 (0.79-0.91; p<0.001) and 0.54 (0.41-0.70; p<0.001) respectively. By day 30, 14.15% (12.45-16.05) of patients who had received PQ had a fall in haemoglobin (Hb) below 7g/dl compared to 20.43% (16.67-24.89) of patients treated without PQ; AHR = 0.66 (0.45-0.97; p = 0.033). A total of 75 (0.3%) patients died within 30 days of treatment with a mortality risk of 0.27% (0.21-0.35) in patients treated with PQ, compared to 0.38% (0.24-0.60) without PQ; AHR = 0.79 (0.43-1.45; p = 0.448). In Papua, Indonesia routine administration of PQ radical cure without prior G6PD testing, was associated with lower risk of all cause hospitalization and other serious adverse clinical outcomes. In areas where G6PD testing is not available or cannot be delivered reliably, the risks of drug induced haemolysis should be balanced against the potential benefits of reducing recurrent P. vivax malaria and its associated morbidity and mortality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.