Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33175834›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Factors influencing precision medicine knowledge and attitudes.

Rohini Chakravarthy, Sarah C Stallings, Michael Williams, Megan Hollister, Mario Davidson, Juan Canedo, Consuelo H Wilkins

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. ThePatterns (New York, N.Y.) · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rohini ChakravarthyVanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-9640-8200
Sarah C StallingsMeharry-Vanderbilt Alliance, Nashville, TN, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-6187-3479
Michael WilliamsDepartment of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, United States of America.
Megan HollisterDepartment of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, United States of America.
Mario DavidsonDepartment of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, United States of America.
Juan CanedoDepartment of Medicine, Division of Geriatrics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States of America.
Consuelo H WilkinsMeharry-Vanderbilt Alliance, Nashville, TN, United States of America.
Vanderbilt University · USVanderbilt University Medical Center · US

Funding

The Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research (VICTR)UL1TR000445 · NCATS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI BERNARD, GORDON RAPHAEL · 2012 to 2016
$41.4M
NRSA Training CoreTL1TR002244 · NCATS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI Julie A. Bastarache · 2017 to 2026
$4.6M
Learning Health System training program: PROgRESS--Patient/ pRactice Outcomes and Research in Effectiveness and Systems ScienceT32HS026122 · AHRQ · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI GRIJALVA, CARLOS G, ROUMIE, CHRISTIANNE L. · 2018 to 2024
$3.5M
AHRQ HHS T32 HS026122NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR002244NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000445
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Precision medicine holds great promise for improving health and reducing health disparities that can be most fully realized by advancing diversity and inclusion in research participants. Without engaging underrepresented groups, precision medicine could not only fail to achieve its promise but also further exacerbate the health disparities already burdening the most vulnerable. Yet underrepresentation by people of non-European ancestry continues in precision medicine research and there are disparities across racial groups in the uptake of precision medicine applications and services. Studies have explored possible explanations for population differences in precision medicine participation, but full appreciation of the factors involved is still developing. To better inform the potential for addressing health disparities through PM, we assessed the relationship of precision medicine knowledge and trust in biomedical research with sociodemographic variables. Using a series of linear regression models applied to survey data collected in a diverse sample, we analyzed variation in both precision medicine knowledge and trust in biomedical research with socioeconomic factors as a way to understand the range of precision medicine knowledge (PMK) in a broadly representative group and its relationship to trust in research and demographic characteristics. Our results demonstrate that identifying as Black, while significantly PMK, explains only 1.5% of the PMK variance in unadjusted models and 7% of overall variance in models adjusted for meaningful covariates such as age, marital status, employment, and education. We also found a positive association between PMK and trust in biomedical research. These results indicate that race is a factor affecting PMK, even after accounting for differences in sociodemographic variables. Additional work is needed, however, to identify other factors contributing to variation in PMK as we work to increase diversity and inclusion in precision medicine applications.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth Status DisparitiesPrecision MedicineSocioeconomic FactorsEducational StatusEthnicityFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID33175834
PMCPMC7657499
OpenAlexW3098318979

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.