ArticleJMIR research protocols2020
COVID-19 Misinformation Prophylaxis: Protocol for a Randomized Trial of a Brief Informational Intervention.
Article in JMIR research protocols, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04557241 (Brief Informational Intervention for COVID-19 Misinformation Prophylaxis), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Brief Informational Intervention for COVID-19 Misinformation Prophylaxis
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Using Normative Language When Describing Scientific Findings: Randomized Controlled Trial of Effects on Trust and Credibility.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023Trial
- Intervening on Trust in Science to Reduce Belief in COVID-19 Misinformation and Increase COVID-19 Preventive Behavioral Intentions: Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of medical Internet research · 2021Trial
- Using infographics to improve trust in science: a randomized pilot test.BMC research notes · 2021Trial
- The journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis: commemorating the written word in science and medicine: three decades and counting.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2024Article
- Using Normative Language When Describing Scientific Findings: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial of Effects on Trust and Credibility.JMIR research protocols · 2022Article
- Interventions to mitigate COVID-19 misinformation: protocol for a scoping review.Systematic reviews · 2022Article
- Design Principles for an Educational Intervention Into Online Vaccine Misinformation.TechTrends : for leaders in education & training · 2022Article
- A Perspective on Implementation Outcomes and Strategies to Promote the Uptake of COVID-19 Vaccines.Frontiers in health services · 2022Article
- An Evaluation of a Microlearning Intervention to Limit COVID-19 Online Misinformation.Journal of formative design in learning · 2022Article
- Physicians' Role in the COVID-19 Infodemic: A Reflection.Southern medical journal · 2021Article
- Hand Hygiene and Mask-Wearing Practices during COVID-19 among Healthcare Workers: Misinformation as a Predictor.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2021Article
- Factors associated with reported likelihood to get vaccinated for COVID-19 in a nationally representative US survey.Public health · 2021Article
- Development of the 12-Item Social Media Disinformation Scale and its Association With Social Media Addiction and Mental Health Related to COVID-19 in Tunisia: Survey-Based Pilot Case Study.JMIR formative research · 2021Article
- A coordinated strategy to develop and distribute infographics addressing COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and misinformation.Journal of the American Pharmacists Association : JAPhAArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAs the COVID-19 pandemic continues to affect life in the United States, the important role of nonpharmaceutical preventive behaviors (such as wearing a face mask) in reducing the risk of infection has become clear. During the pandemic, researchers have observed the rapid proliferation of misinformed or inconsistent narratives about COVID-19. There is growing evidence that such misinformed narratives are associated with various forms of undesirable behavior (eg, burning down cell towers). Furthermore, individuals' adherence to recommended COVID-19 preventive guidelines has been inconsistent, and such mandates have engendered opposition and controversy. Recent research suggests the possibility that trust in science and scientists may be an important thread to weave throughout these seemingly disparate components of the modern public health landscape. Thus, this paper describes the protocol for a randomized trial of a brief, digital intervention designed to increase trust in science.
objectiveThe objective of this study is to examine whether exposure to a curated infographic can increase trust in science, reduce the believability of misinformed narratives, and increase the likelihood to engage in preventive behaviors.
methodsThis is a randomized, placebo-controlled, superiority trial comprising 2 parallel groups. A sample of 1000 adults aged ≥18 years who are representative of the population of the United States by gender, race and ethnicity, and age will be randomly assigned (via a 1:1 allocation) to an intervention or a placebo-control arm. The intervention will be a digital infographic with content based on principles of trust in science, developed by a health communications expert. The intervention will then be both pretested and pilot-tested to determine its viability. Study outcomes will include trust in science, a COVID-19 narrative belief latent profile membership, and the likelihood to engage in preventive behaviors, which will be controlled by 8 theoretically selected covariates.
resultsThis study was funded in August 2020, approved by the Indiana University Institutional Review Board on September 15, 2020, and prospectively registered with ClinicalTrials.gov.
conclusionsCOVID-19 misinformation prophylaxis is crucial. This proposed experiment investigates the impact of a brief yet actionable intervention that can be easily disseminated to increase individuals' trust in science, with the intention of affecting misinformation believability and, consequently, preventive behavioral intentions.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT04557241; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04557241. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): PRR1-10.2196/24383.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.