Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33175321›Full record

ArticleEndocrine2021

Distinctive features of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms exhibiting an increment in proliferative activity during the course of the disease.

Krystallenia I Alexandraki, Maria Kaltsatou, Georgios Kyriakopoulos, Vasiliki Mavroeidi, Akrivi Kostopoulou, Karine Atlan, Stamatios Theocharis, Guido Rindi, Ashley B Grossman, Simona Grozinsky-Glasberg and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Endocrine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors andTherapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Krystallenia I AlexandrakiENETS Center of Excellence, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece. alexandrakik@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-2398-6768
Maria KaltsatouENETS Center of Excellence, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Georgios KyriakopoulosENETS Center of Excellence, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Vasiliki MavroeidiEndocrine Unit, 1st Department of Propaedeutic Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Akrivi KostopoulouDepartment of Pathology, "G. Gennimatas" General Hospital, Athens, Greece.
Karine AtlanDepartment of Pathology, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.
Stamatios TheocharisENETS Center of Excellence, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Guido RindiAnatomic Pathology Section, Department of Life Sciences and Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy.
Ashley B GrossmanCentre for Endocrinology, William Harvey Research Institute, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Simona Grozinsky-GlasbergNeuroendocrine Tumor Unit, ENETS Center of Excellence, Department of Endocrinology, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.
Gregory A KaltsasENETS Center of Excellence, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens · GRHadassah Medical Center · ILGeneral Hospital of Athens G. Genimatas · GRQueen Mary University of London · GBUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeNeuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) differ in their biological behavior and growth potential in a way that can be predicted using histological classification and grading systems. A subset of pancreatic NENs (pNENs) may develop a more aggressive phenotype during the course of the disease, associated with an increase in the Ki-67 proliferation index (PI). The purpose of the study was to present the clinical characteristics of these patients.

methodsUsing re-biopsy of growing lesions, we investigated the increase in Ki-67 PI sufficient to change initial grading (G).

resultsOf 264 patients with well differentiated (WD) pNENs who showed progressive disease during follow-up, 15 (6%) exhibited an increase in Ki-67 PI at a median time 36.8 (9.3-255.8) months. All neoplasms had WD-morphology: five had G1 (Ki-67 median value 1%), nine G2 (median value 5%), one G3 (25%) grades. Upon change of Ki-67 PI, 3 patients had G2 (8%) and 12 G3 (57.5%) NENs, while all retained their WD-morphology. At last follow-up, eight patients were alive with a median overall survival (OS) of 52.5 (9.5-264.3) months. Μedian OS was shorter in patients who had a change in Ki-67 PI before 36 months compared to those who had a change of Ki-67 PI at a later stage (27.5 95%CI: 11.88-43.06 vs. 120.87 95%CI: 96.05-145.69; log-rank p = 0.018).

conclusionsDuring the course of their disease, 6% patients with progressive pNENs develop an increase in Ki-67 PI resulting in an increase in grading status while maintaining their morphology. This process is associated with worse OS when it occurs at an early stage.

Indexed as

Neuroendocrine TumorsPancreatic NeoplasmsDiagnostic Tests, RoutineHumansKi-67 AntigenNeoplasm GradingNeoplasm StagingPrognosisKi-67 AntigenChange of Ki-67 PIDe-differentiationKi-67Neuroendocrine neoplasmsp53

Identifiers

PMID33175321
OpenAlexW3104793789

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.