Observational studyJournal of clinical monitoring and computing2021
Normative values for SedLine-based processed electroencephalography parameters in awake volunteers: a prospective observational study.
Observational study in Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Processed EEG for personalized dosing of anesthetics during general anesthesia].Die Anaesthesiologie · 2023Review
- Changes in SedLine-derived processed electroencephalographic parameters during hypothermia in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Article
- Comparative analysis of the effect of electromyogram to bispectral index and 95% spectral edge frequency under remimazolam and propofol anesthesia: a prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
- Characteristics of Electroencephalogram in the Prefrontal Cortex during Deep Brain Stimulation of Subthalamic Nucleus in Parkinson's Disease under Propofol General Anesthesia.Brain sciences · 2022Article
- Correlation of Sedline-generated variables and clinical signs with anaesthetic depth in experimental pigs receiving propofol.PloS one · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Processed electroencephalography (pEEG) is used to monitor depth of anaesthesia and/or sedation. A novel device (SedLine®) has been recently introduced into clinical practice. However, there are no published data on baseline SedLine values for awake adult subjects. We aimed to determine baseline values for SedLine-derived parameters in eyes-open and eyes-closed states. We performed a prospective observational study in healthy volunteers. SedLine EEG-derived parameters were recorded for 2 min with eyes closed and 8 min with eyes open. We determined the overall reference range for each value, as well as the reference range in each phase. We investigated changes in recorded parameters between the two phases, and the interaction between EMG, baseline characteristics, and Patient State Index (PSI). We collected data from 50 healthy volunteers, aged 23-63 years. Median PSI was 94 (92-95) with eyes open and 88 (87-91) with eyes closed (p < 0.001 for open versus close). EMG activity decreased from 47.2% (46.6-47.9) with eyes open to 28.6% (28.0-29.3) with eyes closing (p < 0.001). There was a significant positive correlation between EMG and PSI with eyes closed (p = 0.01) but not with eyes open, which was confirmed with linear regression analysis (p = 0.01). In awake volunteers, keeping eyes open induces significant changes to SedLine-derived parameters, most likely due to increased EMG activity (e.g. eye blinking). These findings have implications for the clinical interpretation of PSI parameters and for the planning of future research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33175254What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.