ArticleOecologia2020
Just add water: rapid assembly of new communities in previously dry riverbeds, and limited long-distance effects on existing communities.
Article in Oecologia, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Bigger is not necessarily better: empirical tests show that dispersal proxies misrepresent actual dispersal ability.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2024Article
- A large-scale field experiment across six rivers illustrates how the effects of resource enrichment are context dependent.Oecologia · 2023Article
- Isolation controls reestablishment mechanisms and post-drying community structure in an intermittent stream.Ecology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Barriers preventing species from dispersing to a location can have a major influence on how communities assemble. Dispersal success may also depend on whether dispersers have to colonise an established community or a largely depauperate location. In freshwater systems, dams and weirs have fragmented rivers, potentially limiting dispersal of biota along rivers. Decommissioning aqueducts on two weirs, each within a tributary of different regulated rivers, delivered flow to previously dry riverbeds and additional flows to the main stem, regulated rivers further downstream. This provided an opportunity to test how removal of dispersal constraints affected community assembly in new habitats and whether changed dispersal can alter existing communities. The results were very similar for the two systems. Even with dispersal constrained via reduced drift rates, the new communities in the newly formed habitat in tributaries rapidly resembled unimpacted reference communities that were the source of colonists. For established communities (regulated rivers), greater flow increased the densities of filter feeders but this was due to greater areas of fast-flowing habitat (a change in environmental constraints) rather than higher dispersal rates. Our study illustrates that communities can quickly re-assemble when natural channels that have been dry for decades are re-wetted by flows that deliver dispersers from intact locations upstream. Nevertheless, boosting flows and concomitant densities of dispersers had no strong effects on existing communities. Instead, increased discharges effected a reduction in environmental constraints, which altered trophic structure. Thus, increases in discharge and dispersal produced different outcomes in new versus established communities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.