ArticleJournal of medical systems2020
Low-Cost Office-Based Cardiovascular Risk Stratification Using Machine Learning and Focused Carotid Ultrasound in an Asian-Indian Cohort.
Article in Journal of medical systems, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence in Cardiovascular Ultrasound: Clinical Applications, Foundation Models, and the Path to Precision Cardiology.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Women's Cardiovascular Disease and Stroke Risk Stratification Using a Precision and Personalized Framework Embedded with an Explainable Artificial Intelligence Paradigm: A Narrative Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- An Artificial Intelligence-Based Non-Invasive Approach for Cardiovascular Disease Risk Stratification in Obstructive Sleep Apnea Patients: A Narrative Review.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Review
- UltraAIGenomics: Artificial Intelligence-Based Cardiovascular Disease Risk Assessment by Fusion of Ultrasound-Based Radiomics and Genomics Features for Preventive, Personalized and Precision Medicine: A Narrative Review.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Review
- Polygenic Risk Score for Cardiovascular Diseases in Artificial Intelligence Paradigm: A Review.Journal of Korean medical science · 2023Review
- Cardiovascular disease/stroke risk stratification in deep learning framework: a review.Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy · 2023Review
- Estimation of Physiologic Pressures: Invasive and Non-Invasive Techniques, AI Models, and Future Perspectives.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Machine Learning and the Conundrum of Stroke Risk Prediction.Arrhythmia & electrophysiology review · 2023Review
- Economics of Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare: Diagnosis vs. Treatment.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Cardiovascular/Stroke Risk Stratification in Diabetic Foot Infection Patients Using Deep Learning-Based Artificial Intelligence: An Investigative Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- Deep Learning Paradigm for Cardiovascular Disease/Stroke Risk Stratification in Parkinson's Disease Affected by COVID-19: A Narrative Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Cardiovascular/Stroke Risk Assessment in Patients with Erectile Dysfunction-A Role of Carotid Wall Arterial Imaging and Plaque Tissue Characterization Using Artificial Intelligence Paradigm: A Narrative Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Cardiovascular Risk Stratification in Diabetic Retinopathy via Atherosclerotic Pathway in COVID-19/Non-COVID-19 Frameworks Using Artificial Intelligence Paradigm: A Narrative Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Cardiovascular/Stroke Risk Stratification in Parkinson's Disease Patients Using Atherosclerosis Pathway and Artificial Intelligence Paradigm: A Systematic Review.Metabolites · 2022Review
- A Powerful Paradigm for Cardiovascular Risk Stratification Using Multiclass, Multi-Label, and Ensemble-Based Machine Learning Paradigms: A Narrative Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Role of artificial intelligence in cardiovascular risk prediction and outcomes: comparison of machine-learning and conventional statistical approaches for the analysis of carotid ultrasound features and intra-plaque neovascularization.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study developed an office-based cardiovascular risk calculator using a machine learning (ML) algorithm that utilized a focused carotid ultrasound. The design of this study was divided into three steps. The first step involved collecting 18 office-based biomarkers consisting of six clinical risk factors (age, sex, body mass index, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and smoking) and 12 carotid ultrasound image-based phenotypes. The second step consisted of the design of an ML-based cardiovascular risk calculator-called "AtheroEdge Composite Risk Score 2.0" (AECRS2.0
Indexed as
Identifiers
33175247What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.