Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33175210›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of urology2021

The Mayo Adhesive Probability score can help predict intra- and postoperative complications in patients undergoing laparoscopic donor nephrectomy.

Quentin Franquet, Xavier Matillon, Nicolas Terrier, Jean-Jacques Rambeaud, Sebastien Crouzet, Jean-Alexandre Long, Hakim Fassi-Fehri, Ricardo Codas-Duarte, Delphine Poncet, Thomas Jouve and 6 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of urology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Quentin FranquetDepartment of Urology and Kidney Transplantation, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, CS 10217, 38043, Grenoble Cedex 9, France.
Xavier MatillonDepartment of Urology and Transplantation, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
Nicolas TerrierDepartment of Urology and Kidney Transplantation, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, CS 10217, 38043, Grenoble Cedex 9, France.
Jean-Jacques RambeaudDepartment of Urology and Kidney Transplantation, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, CS 10217, 38043, Grenoble Cedex 9, France.
Sebastien CrouzetDepartment of Urology and Transplantation, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
Jean-Alexandre LongDepartment of Urology and Kidney Transplantation, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, CS 10217, 38043, Grenoble Cedex 9, France.
Hakim Fassi-FehriDepartment of Urology and Transplantation, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
Ricardo Codas-DuarteDepartment of Urology and Transplantation, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
Delphine PoncetDepartment of Urology and Kidney Transplantation, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, CS 10217, 38043, Grenoble Cedex 9, France.
Thomas JouveDepartment of Nephrology, Hemodialysis, Apheresis and Kidney Transplantation, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, Grenoble, France.
Johan NobleDepartment of Nephrology, Hemodialysis, Apheresis and Kidney Transplantation, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, Grenoble, France.
Paolo MalvezziDepartment of Nephrology, Hemodialysis, Apheresis and Kidney Transplantation, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, Grenoble, France.
Lionel RostaingDepartment of Nephrology, Hemodialysis, Apheresis and Kidney Transplantation, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, Grenoble, France.
Jean-Luc DescotesDepartment of Urology and Kidney Transplantation, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, CS 10217, 38043, Grenoble Cedex 9, France.
Lionel BadetDepartment of Urology and Transplantation, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
Gaelle FiardDepartment of Urology and Kidney Transplantation, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, CS 10217, 38043, Grenoble Cedex 9, France. gfiard@chu-grenoble.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3049-5318

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeLiving donor nephrectomy is a high-stake procedure involving healthy individuals, therefore every effort should be made to define each patient's individualized risk and improve potential donors' information. The aim of this study was to evaluate the interest of the Mayo adhesive probability (MAP) score, an imaging-based score initially designed to estimate the risk of adherent perinephric fat in partial nephrectomy, to predict intra- and postoperative complications of living donor nephrectomy. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe retrospectively reviewed the imaging, clinical, and follow-up data of 452 kidney donors who underwent laparoscopic donor nephrectomy in two academic centers.

resultsImaging and follow-up data were available for 307 kidney donors, among which 44 (14%) had a high MAP score (≥ 3). Intraoperative difficulties were encountered in 50 patients (16%), including difficult dissection (n = 35) and bleeding (n = 17). Conversion to open surgery was required for 13 patients (4.2%). On multivariate analysis, a MAP score ≥ 3 was significantly associated with the risk of intraoperative difficulty [OR 14.12 (5.58-35.7), p < 0.001] or conversion to open surgery [OR 18.96 (3.42-105.14), p = 0.0042]. Postoperative complications were noted in 99 patients (32%), including 12 patients (3.9%) with Clavien-Dindo grade III-IV complications. On multivariate analysis, a high MAP score was also associated with the risk of postoperative complications [OR 2.55 (1.20-5.40), p = 0.01].

conclusionsIn this retrospective bicentric study, a high MAP score was associated with the risk of intra- and postoperative complications of laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. The MAP score appears of interest in the living donor evaluation process to help improve donors' information and outcomes.

Indexed as

LaparoscopyAdultFemaleHumansIntraoperative ComplicationsMaleMiddle AgedNephrectomyPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesTissue and Organ HarvestingIntraoperative complicationsLaparoscopyLiving donorNephrectomyPostoperative complications

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.