ArticleWorld journal of urology2021
The Mayo Adhesive Probability score can help predict intra- and postoperative complications in patients undergoing laparoscopic donor nephrectomy.
Article in World journal of urology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- CT-based variables of perirenal fat are risk factors for assessing pathological T-stage in patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma.Annals of medicine · 2026Article
- Surgical Approach to Redo Open Living Donor Nephrectomy via the Same Flank Incision: A Case Report.Case reports in transplantation · 2026Article
- Age-dependent predictive limitations of the MAP score in standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy.Urolithiasis · 2025Article
- Article
- The predictive ability of Mayo adhesive probability score for evaluating intraoperative bleeding in standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy in adult patients.Urolithiasis · 2024Observational
- Study of the predictive factors affecting outcomes of patients undergoing transperitoneal laparoscopic donor nephrectomy.International urology and nephrology · 2023Article
- Perinephric Toxic Fat: Impact on Surgical Complexity, Perioperative Outcome, and Surgical Approach in Partial Nephrectomy.Urologia internationalis · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeLiving donor nephrectomy is a high-stake procedure involving healthy individuals, therefore every effort should be made to define each patient's individualized risk and improve potential donors' information. The aim of this study was to evaluate the interest of the Mayo adhesive probability (MAP) score, an imaging-based score initially designed to estimate the risk of adherent perinephric fat in partial nephrectomy, to predict intra- and postoperative complications of living donor nephrectomy. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe retrospectively reviewed the imaging, clinical, and follow-up data of 452 kidney donors who underwent laparoscopic donor nephrectomy in two academic centers.
resultsImaging and follow-up data were available for 307 kidney donors, among which 44 (14%) had a high MAP score (≥ 3). Intraoperative difficulties were encountered in 50 patients (16%), including difficult dissection (n = 35) and bleeding (n = 17). Conversion to open surgery was required for 13 patients (4.2%). On multivariate analysis, a MAP score ≥ 3 was significantly associated with the risk of intraoperative difficulty [OR 14.12 (5.58-35.7), p < 0.001] or conversion to open surgery [OR 18.96 (3.42-105.14), p = 0.0042]. Postoperative complications were noted in 99 patients (32%), including 12 patients (3.9%) with Clavien-Dindo grade III-IV complications. On multivariate analysis, a high MAP score was also associated with the risk of postoperative complications [OR 2.55 (1.20-5.40), p = 0.01].
conclusionsIn this retrospective bicentric study, a high MAP score was associated with the risk of intra- and postoperative complications of laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. The MAP score appears of interest in the living donor evaluation process to help improve donors' information and outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33175210What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.