Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33175180›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2021

Optimal sampling strategies for darunavir and external validation of the underlying population pharmacokinetic model.

Gabriel Stillemans, Leila Belkhir, Bernard Vandercam, Anne Vincent, Vincent Haufroid, Laure Elens

Open access · hybridAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.0field-weighted citation impact, top 58% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Gabriel StillemansIntegrated PharmacoMetrics, PharmacoGenomics and PharmacoKinetics, Louvain Drug Research Institute, Université catholique de Louvain, Avenue E. Mounier 72, B01.72.0, Brussels, Belgium. gabriel.stillemans@uclouvain.be.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2356-4891
Leila BelkhirLouvain Centre for Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, Institut de recherche expérimentale et clinique, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1701-7584
Bernard VandercamAIDS Reference Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Anne VincentAIDS Reference Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Vincent HaufroidLouvain Centre for Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, Institut de recherche expérimentale et clinique, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5040-9806
Laure ElensIntegrated PharmacoMetrics, PharmacoGenomics and PharmacoKinetics, Louvain Drug Research Institute, Université catholique de Louvain, Avenue E. Mounier 72, B01.72.0, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0039-3583
Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc · BEUCLouvain · BE

Funding

Fonds pour la Formation à la Recherche dans l'Industrie et dans l'Agriculture (FRIA) FC16749
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeA variety of diagnostic methods are available to validate the performance of population pharmacokinetic models. Internal validation, which applies these methods to the model building dataset and to additional data generated through Monte Carlo simulations, is often sufficient, but external validation, which requires a new dataset, is considered a more rigorous approach, especially if the model is to be used for predictive purposes. Our first objective was to validate a previously published population pharmacokinetic model of darunavir, an HIV protease inhibitor boosted with ritonavir or cobicistat. Our second objective was to use this model to derive optimal sampling strategies that maximize the amount of information collected with as few pharmacokinetic samples as possible.

methodsA validation dataset comprising 164 sparsely sampled individuals using ritonavir-boosted darunavir was used for validation. Standard plots of predictions and residuals, NPDE, visual predictive check, and bootstrapping were applied to both the validation set and the combined learning/validation set in NONMEM to assess model performance. D-optimal designs for darunavir were then calculated in PopED and further evaluated in NONMEM through simulations.

resultsExternal validation confirmed model robustness and accuracy in most scenarios but also highlighted several limitations. The best one-, two-, and three-point sampling strategies were determined to be pre-dose (0 h); 0 and 4 h; and 1, 4, and 19 h, respectively. A combination of samples at 0, 1, and 4 h was comparable to the optimal three-point strategy. These could be used to reliably estimate individual pharmacokinetic parameters, although with fewer samples, precision decreased and the number of outliers increased significantly.

conclusionsOptimal sampling strategies derived from this model could be used in clinical practice to enhance therapeutic drug monitoring or to conduct additional pharmacokinetic studies.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalAdultAgedDarunavirFemaleHIV InfectionsHIV Protease InhibitorsHumansMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsDarunavirHIV Protease InhibitorsDarunavirExternal validationHIVLimited sampling strategyOptimal sampling strategyPopulation pharmacokinetics

Identifiers

PMID33175180
PMCPMC7935830
OpenAlexW3103839995

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.