Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33175177›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2020

Trends in Poor Health Indicators Among Black and Hispanic Middle-aged and Older Adults in the United States, 1999-2018.

Michelle Odlum, Nathalie Moise, Ian M Kronish, Peter Broadwell, Carmela Alcántara, Nicole J Davis, Ying Kuen K Cheung, Adler Perotte, Sunmoo Yoon

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 89 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Michelle OdlumColumbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York.
Nathalie MoiseDivision of General Medicine, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York.
Ian M KronishDivision of General Medicine, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York.
Peter BroadwellCenter for Interdisciplinary Digital Research, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
Carmela AlcántaraColumbia University School of Social Work, New York, New York.
Nicole J DavisClemson University School of Nursing, Clemson, South Carolina.
Ying Kuen K CheungDepartment of Biostatistics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York.
Adler PerotteDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York.
Sunmoo YoonDivision of General Medicine, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York.
Columbia University Irving Medical Center · USClemson University · USColumbia University · USStanford University · US

Funding

Using Twitter to Enhance the Social Support of Hispanic and Black Dementia Caregivers (Tweet-SS)R01AG060929 · NIA · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI YOON, SUNMOO · 2019 to 2023
$3.0M
TRANSFORM DEPCARE: A Theoretical approach to improving patient engagement and shared decision making for minorities in collaborative depression careR01HS025198 · AHRQ · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI MOISE, NATHALIE · 2017 to 2021
$1.8M
Identifying Novel Behavioral Targets for Improving Sleep: A Self-Regulation ModelK23HL125748 · NHLBI · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI ALCANTARA, CARMELA · 2015 to 2019
$924k
AHRQ HHS R01 HS025198NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL125748NIA NIH HHS R01 AG060929
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Adults who belong to racial/ethnic minority groups are more likely than White adults to receive a diagnosis of chronic disease in the United States. Objective: To evaluate which health indicators have improved or become worse among Black and Hispanic middle-aged and older adults since the Minority Health and Health Disparities Research and Education Act of 2000. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this repeated cross-sectional study, a total of 4 856 326 records were extracted from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System from January 1999 through December 2018 of persons who self-identified as Black (non-Hispanic), Hispanic (non-White), or White and who were 45 years or older. Exposure: The 1999 legislation to reduce racial/ethnic health disparities. Main Outcomes and Measures: Poor health indicators and disparities including major chronic diseases, physical inactivity, uninsured status, and overall poor health. Results: Among the 4 856 326 participants (2 958 041 [60.9%] women; mean [SD] age, 60.4 [11.8] years), Black adults showed an overall decrease indicating improvement in uninsured status (β = -0.40%; P < .001) and physical inactivity (β = -0.29%; P < .001), while they showed an overall increase indicating deterioration in hypertension (β = 0.88%; P < .001), diabetes (β = 0.52%; P < .001), asthma (β = 0.25%; P < .001), and stroke (β = 0.15%; P < .001) during the last 20 years. The Black-White gap (ie, the change in β between groups) showed improvement (2 trend lines converging) in uninsured status (-0.20%; P < .001) and physical inactivity (-0.29%; P < .001), while the Black-White gap worsened (2 trend lines diverging) in diabetes (0.14%; P < .001), hypertension (0.15%; P < .001), coronary heart disease (0.07%; P < .001), stroke (0.07%; P < .001), and asthma (0.11%; P < .001). Hispanic adults showed improvement in physical inactivity (β = -0.28%; P = .02) and perceived poor health (β = -0.22%; P = .001), while they showed overall deterioration in hypertension (β = 0.79%; P < .001) and diabetes (β = 0.50%; P < .001). The Hispanic-White gap showed improvement in coronary heart disease (-0.15%; P < .001), stroke (-0.04%; P < .001), kidney disease (-0.06%; P < .001), asthma (-0.06%; P = .02), arthritis (-0.26%; P < .001), depression (-0.23%; P < .001), and physical inactivity (-0.10%; P = .001), while the Hispanic-White gap worsened in diabetes (0.15%; P < .001), hypertension (0.05%; P = .03), and uninsured status (0.09%; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: This study suggests that Black-White disparities increased in diabetes, hypertension, and asthma, while Hispanic-White disparities remained in diabetes, hypertension, and uninsured status.

Indexed as

Health Status DisparitiesAgedArthritisAsthmaBlack or African AmericanCoronary DiseaseCross-Sectional StudiesDepressionDiabetes MellitusFemaleHealth Status IndicatorsHispanic or LatinoHumansHypertensionInsurance, HealthKidney Diseases

Identifiers

PMID33175177
PMCPMC7658737
OpenAlexW3103738001

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.