ArticleJAMA network open2020
Development and Validation of a Risk Model for Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema.
Article in JAMA network open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prediction models for breast cancer-related lymphedema: a systematic review and critical appraisal.Systematic reviews · 2022Pooled it
- Using Machine Learning to Predict Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema Following Axillary Lymph Node Dissection.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Psychosocial Morbidity in Patients with Breast Cancer Related Lymphedema: An Evaluation of Mental Health Diagnoses in Breast Cancer Survivors.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Identification of a Cytokine Biomarker for Prognostic Modeling of Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema.Cancer research communications · 2026Article
- Machine learning-based model to predict liposuction outcomes in unilateral breast cancer-related lymphedema.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- The Canadian Breast Cancer Symposium 2025: Meeting Report.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025Article
- Decellularized lymph node scaffolds accelerate restoration of lymphatic drainage in rat hind limb lymphedema.Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2025Article
- Behavioural trajectories of delay in seeking medical care in participants with breast cancer-related lymphoedema: a qualitative study.BMJ open · 2025Article
- Lymphedema and Axillary-Lateral Thoracic Vessel Juncture Irradiation: A Clinical Dilemma.European journal of breast health · 2025Article
- Which Physical Therapy Intervention Is Most Effective in Reducing Secondary Lymphedema Associated with Breast Cancer? A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Optimizing Lymphedema Management After Breast Cancer: Predictive Risk Models in Clinical Practice.Journal of surgical oncology · 2025Article
- Postoperative cholesterol changes as early predictors of breast cancer-related lymphedema: a retrospective cohort study.Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan) · 2025Article
- Beyond cancer treatment: dermo-aesthetic and other wellness recommendations for breast cancer patients.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025Review
- External Validation of a 5-Factor Risk Model for Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- Machine learning-based personalized risk prediction model for breast cancer-related lymphedema after surgery.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Nomogram for predicting risk of arm lymphedema following axillary lymph node dissection in breast cancer patients.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Can resistance exercise prevent breast cancer-related lymphoedema? A systematic review and metanalysis protocol.BMJ open · 2024Article
- Development and validation of a nomogram for breast cancer-related lymphedema.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Article
- Predictors of Unilateral Arm Lymphedema in Non-obese Locoregionally Advanced Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy, Modified Radical Mastectomy, and Postoperative Irradiation.European journal of breast health · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Approximately 1 in 5 patients with breast cancer who undergo axillary lymph node dissection will develop lymphedema. To appropriately triage and monitor these patients for timely diagnosis and treatment, robust risk models are required. Objective: To evaluate the prognostic value of mammographic breast density in estimating lymphedema severity. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prognostic study collected data from July 16, 2018, to March 3, 2020, from the electronic health records of patients of the Cancer Rehabilitation and Survivorship Program at the Princess Margaret Cancer Centre in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Participants included women who had completed curative treatment for a first diagnosis of breast cancer and who were referred to the program. Also included were a sample of patients in the general breast oncology population who were receiving follow-up care at the center during the same period but who were not referred to the program. All patients attended follow-up appointments at the Princess Margaret Cancer Centre from January 1, 2016, to May 1, 2018. The cohort was randomly split 2:1 to group patients into a training cohort and a validation cohort. Exposures: Participant demographic and clinical characteristics included age, sex, body mass index (BMI), medical history, cancer characteristics, and cancer treatment. Main Outcomes and Measures: Spearman correlation coefficient between measured and predicted volume of lymphedema was calculated. Area under the curve (AUC) values were generated for predicting the occurrence of at least mild lymphedema (volume, >200 mL) and severe lymphedema (volume, >500 mL) at the time of initial lymphedema diagnosis. Results: A total of 373 female patients (median [interquartile range] age, 52.3 [45.9-60.1] years) were eligible for this analysis. Multivariate linear regression identified 3 patient factors (age, BMI, and mammographic breast density), 1 cancer factor (number of pathological lymph nodes), and 1 treatment factor (axillary lymph node dissection) as independent prognostic variables. In validation testing, Spearman correlation revealed a statistically significant moderate correlation (coefficient, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.26-0.56; P < .001) between measured volume and predicted volume of lymphedema. The AUC values were 0.72 (95% CI, 0.60-0.83) for predicting the occurrence of mild lymphedema and 0.83 (95% CI, 0.74-0.93) for severe lymphedema. Conclusions and Relevance: This prognostic study found that patients with low breast density appeared to be at a higher risk of developing severe lymphedema. The finding suggests that by combining breast density with established risk factors a multivariate linear regression model could be used to predict the development of lymphedema and provide volumetric estimates of lymphedema severity in patients with breast cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.