Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33175168›Full record

ArticleGigaScience2020

Adaptive venom evolution and toxicity in octopods is driven by extensive novel gene formation, expansion, and loss.

Brooke L Whitelaw, Ira R Cooke, Julian Finn, Rute R da Fonseca, Elena A Ritschard, M T P Gilbert, Oleg Simakov, Jan M Strugnell

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in GigaScience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
8.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Convergent evolution of toxin resistance in animals.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2022
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Genome Analysis ofFrontiers in genetics · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Brooke L WhitelawCentre for Sustainable Tropical Fisheries and Aquaculture, James Cook University, 1 James Cook Dr, Douglas QLD 4811 , Australia.
Ira R CookeCollege of Public Health, Medical and Vet Sciences, James Cook University,1 James Cook Dr, Douglas QLD 4811 , Australia.
Julian FinnSciences, Museum Victoria, 11 Nicholson St, Carlton, Victoria 3053, Australia.
Rute R da FonsecaCenter for Macroecology, Evolution and Climate (CMEC), GLOBE Institute, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 15, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Elena A RitschardDepartment of Neurosciences and Developmental Biology, University of Vienna,Universitätsring 1, 1010 Wien, Vienna, Austria.
M T P GilbertCenter for Evolutionary Hologenomics, GLOBE Institute, University of Copenhagen, Øster Voldgade 5-7, 1350 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Oleg SimakovDepartment of Neurosciences and Developmental Biology, University of Vienna,Universitätsring 1, 1010 Wien, Vienna, Austria.
Jan M StrugnellCentre for Sustainable Tropical Fisheries and Aquaculture, James Cook University, 1 James Cook Dr, Douglas QLD 4811 , Australia.
La Trobe University · AUMuseums Victoria · AUUniversity of Copenhagen · DKUniversity of Vienna · AT

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF P 30686
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCephalopods represent a rich system for investigating the genetic basis underlying organismal novelties. This diverse group of specialized predators has evolved many adaptations including proteinaceous venom. Of particular interest is the blue-ringed octopus genus (Hapalochlaena), which are the only octopods known to store large quantities of the potent neurotoxin, tetrodotoxin, within their tissues and venom gland.

findingsTo reveal genomic correlates of organismal novelties, we conducted a comparative study of 3 octopod genomes, including the Southern blue-ringed octopus (Hapalochlaena maculosa). We present the genome of this species and reveal highly dynamic evolutionary patterns at both non-coding and coding organizational levels. Gene family expansions previously reported in Octopus bimaculoides (e.g., zinc finger and cadherins, both associated with neural functions), as well as formation of novel gene families, dominate the genomic landscape in all octopods. Examination of tissue-specific genes in the posterior salivary gland revealed that expression was dominated by serine proteases in non-tetrodotoxin-bearing octopods, while this family was a minor component in H. maculosa. Moreover, voltage-gated sodium channels in H. maculosa contain a resistance mutation found in pufferfish and garter snakes, which is exclusive to the genus. Analysis of the posterior salivary gland microbiome revealed a diverse array of bacterial species, including genera that can produce tetrodotoxin, suggestive of a possible production source.

conclusionsWe present the first tetrodotoxin-bearing octopod genome H. maculosa, which displays lineage-specific adaptations to tetrodotoxin acquisition. This genome, along with other recently published cephalopod genomes, represents a valuable resource from which future work could advance our understanding of the evolution of genomic novelty in this family.

Indexed as

OctopodiformesVenomsAdaptation, PhysiologicalAnimalsGenomeHumansTetrodotoxinTetrodotoxinVenomscephalopod genomecomparative genomicsgene family expansionstransposable elementsvenom evolution

Identifiers

PMID33175168
PMCPMC7656900
OpenAlexW3104961268

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.