Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33174964›Full record

ArticleRevista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical2020

Tracking excess deaths associated with the COVID-19 epidemic as an epidemiological surveillance strategy-preliminary results of the evaluation of six Brazilian capitals.

André Ricardo Ribas Freitas, Nicole Montenegro de Medeiros, Livia Carla Vinhal Frutuoso, Otto Albuquerque Beckedorff, Lucas Mariscal Alves de Martin, Marcela Montenegro de Medeiros Coelho, Giovanna Gimenez Souza de Freitas, Daniele Rocha Queiróz Lemos, Luciano Pamplona de Góes Cavalcanti

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. How many more? Under-reporting of the COVID-19 deaths in Brazil in 2020.Tropical medicine & international health : TM & IH · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

André Ricardo Ribas FreitasFaculdade de Medicina São Leopoldo Mandic de Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0291-7771
Nicole Montenegro de MedeirosFaculdade de Medicina São Leopoldo Mandic de Campinas, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Saúde Coletiva, Campinas, SP, Brasil.
Livia Carla Vinhal FrutuosoMinistério da Saúde, Brasília, DF, Brasil.
Otto Albuquerque BeckedorffFaculdade de Medicina São Leopoldo Mandic de Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brasil.
Lucas Mariscal Alves de MartinFaculdade de Medicina São Leopoldo Mandic de Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brasil.
Marcela Montenegro de Medeiros CoelhoUniversidade Federal de Uberlândia, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária, Uberlândia, MG, Brasil.
Giovanna Gimenez Souza de FreitasFaculdade de Medicina de Marília, Marília, SP, Brasil.
Daniele Rocha Queiróz LemosCentro Universitário Christus, Faculdade de Medicina, Fortaleza, CE, Brasil.
Luciano Pamplona de Góes CavalcantiUniversidade Federal do Ceará, Programa de Pós-graduação em Saúde Coletiva, Fortaleza, CE, Brasil.
Faculdade São Leopoldo Mandic · BRFaculdade de Medicina de Marília · BRMinistério da Saúde · STUnichristus · BRUniversidade Federal de Uberlândia · BRUniversidade Federal do Ceará · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIn March 2020, the World Health Organization declared the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak a pandemic. In Brazil, 110 thousand cases and 5,901 deaths were confirmed by the end of April 2020. The scarcity of laboratory resources, the overload on the service network, and the broad clinical spectrum of the disease make it difficult to document all the deaths due to COVID-19. The aim of this study was to assess the mortality rate in Brazilian capitals with a high incidence of COVID-19.

methodsWe assessed the weekly mortality between epidemiological week 1 and 16 in 2020 and the corresponding period in 2019. We estimated the expected mortality at 95% confidence interval by projecting the mortality in 2019 to the population in 2020, using data from the National Association of Civil Registrars (ARPEN-Brasil).

resultsIn the five capitals with the highest incidence of COVID-19, we identified excess deaths during the pandemic. The age group above 60 years was severely affected, while 31% of the excess deaths occurred in the age group of 20-59 years. There was a strong correlation (r = 0.94) between excess deaths and the number of deaths confirmed by epidemiological monitoring. The epidemiological surveillance captured only 52% of all mortality associated with the COVID-19 pandemic in the cities examined.

conclusionsConsidering the simplicity of the method and its low cost, we believe that the assessment of excess mortality associated with the COVID-19 pandemic should be used as a complementary tool for regular epidemiological surveillance.

Indexed as

MortalityAdultBetacoronavirusBrazilCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19HumansMiddle AgedPandemicsPneumonia, ViralSARS-CoV-2Young Adult

Identifiers

PMID33174964
PMCPMC7670756
OpenAlexW3095049727

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.