Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33174948›Full record

ArticleClinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil)2020

Online learning and COVID-19: a meta-synthesis analysis.

Cristina Pires Camargo, Patricia Zen Tempski, Fabio Freitas Busnardo, Milton de Arruda Martins, Rolf Gemperli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 90 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
90citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

90 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. An e-Problem-Based Learning Program for Infection Control in Nursing Homes: A Quasi-Experimental Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

30 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Cristina Pires CamargoLaboratorio de Cirurgia Plastica e Microgirurgia (LIM-04), Faculdade de Medicina (FMUSP), Universidade de Sao Paulo, SP, BR.ORCID 0000-0002-3134-0003
Patricia Zen TempskiFaculdade de Medicina (FMUSP), Universidade de Sao Paulo, SP, BR.ORCID 0000-0003-4199-055X
Fabio Freitas BusnardoDivisao de Cirurgia Plastica, Faculdade de Medicina (FMUSP), Universidade de Sao Paulo, SP, BR.ORCID 0000-0003-0436-1383
Milton de Arruda MartinsFaculdade de Medicina (FMUSP), Universidade de Sao Paulo, SP, BR.ORCID 0000-0001-9690-9371
Rolf GemperliDivisao de Cirurgia Plastica, Faculdade de Medicina (FMUSP), Universidade de Sao Paulo, SP, BR.ORCID 0000-0001-9913-6079

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic demanded a quick shift from presential to e-learning processes. Unlike planned e-learning programs, medical schools have had to quickly deliver the entire medical curriculum using remote strategies. This study aimed to perform a meta-synthesis of previous pandemic situations and describe the experience of the São Paulo University School of Medicine. We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Medline, EMBASE, Lilacs, Scopus, Web of Science, and ERIC, using the following keywords: ("SARS" OR "severe acute respiratory syndrome" OR "severe acute respiratory syndrome" OR "Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus" OR "middle east respiratory syndrome*" OR "MERS-CoV" OR "Mers" OR "Middle Eastern Respiratory Syndrome*" OR "MERS-CoV*" OR "coronavirus" OR "Coronavirus Infections" OR "coronavirus*" OR "COVID-19" OR "2019-nCoV" OR "SARS-CoV-2") AND ("online education" OR "Education, Distance" OR "e-learning" OR "course online" OR "flipped classroom") AND ("lockdown" OR "social distance" OR "quarantine"). The endpoints were the online platforms used for online learning, the model of class, recorded versus online interaction, duration of online lectures, and students' and teachers' perceptions of online learning. We retrieved 38 records; only seven articles studied online education methods related to the pandemic and social distancing rules. The most frequently used online platform was Zoom®. The studies examined both synchronous and asynchronous approaches. There was no evidence regarding duration and students' and teachers' attitude. This study suggests that the online learning shift was feasible; however, because of the nature of the education shift (pandemic), future studies must further analyze the educational structure.

Indexed as

BetacoronavirusCoronavirus InfectionsEducation, DistancePandemicsPneumonia, ViralCOVID-19HumansSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID33174948
PMCPMC7605278

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.