Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33174857›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2020

Exploring Novel Funding Strategies for Innovative Medical Research: The HORAO Crowdfunding Campaign.

Philippe Schucht, Diana M Roccaro-Waldmeyer, Michael Murek, Irena Zubak, Johannes Goldberg, Stephanie Falk, Fried-Michael Dahlweid, Andreas Raabe

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Philippe Schucht *Department of Neurosurgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-8025-3694
Diana M Roccaro-Waldmeyer *Insel Data Science Center, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-4401-1567
Michael MurekDepartment of Neurosurgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-9874-1135
Irena ZubakDepartment of Neurosurgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-8474-6421
Johannes GoldbergDepartment of Neurosurgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-6066-3549
Stephanie FalkDepartment of Neurosurgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-7986-188X
Fried-Michael DahlweidInsel Data Science Center, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-5416-9915
Andreas RaabeDepartment of Neurosurgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-3886-466X
University of Bern · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe rise of the internet and social media has boosted online crowdfunding as a novel strategy to raise funds for kick-starting projects, but it is rarely used in science.

objectiveWe report on an online crowdfunding campaign launched in the context of the neuroscience project HORAO. The aim of HORAO was to develop a noninvasive real-time method to visualize neuronal fiber tracts during brain surgery in order to better delineate tumors and to identify crucial cerebral landmarks. The revenue from the crowdfunding campaign was to be used to sponsor a crowdsourcing campaign for the HORAO project.

methodsWe ran a 7-week reward-based crowdfunding campaign on a national crowdfunding platform, offering optional material and experiential rewards in return for a contribution toward raising our target of Swiss francs (CHF) 50,000 in financial support (roughly equivalent to US $50,000 at the time of the campaign). We used various owned media (websites and social media), as well as earned media (press releases and news articles) to raise awareness about our project.

resultsThe production of an explanatory video took 60 hours, and 31 posts were published on social media (Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter). The campaign raised a total of CHF 69,109. Approximately half of all donations came from donors who forwent a reward (CHF 28,786, 48.74%); the other half came from donors who chose experiential and material rewards in similar proportions (CHF 14,958, 25.33% and CHF 15,315.69, 25.93%, respectively). Of those with an identifiable relationship to the crowdfunding team, patients and their relatives contributed the largest sum (CHF 17,820, 30.17%), followed by friends and family (CHF 9288, 15.73%) and work colleagues (CHF 6028, 10.21%), while 43.89% of funds came from donors who were either anonymous or had an unknown relationship to the crowdfunding team. Patients and their relatives made the largest donations, with a median value of CHF 200 (IQR 90).

conclusionsCrowdfunding proved to be a successful strategy to fund a neuroscience project and to raise awareness of a specific clinical problem. Focusing on potential donors with a personal interest in the issue, such as patients and their relatives in our project, is likely to increase funding success. Compared with traditional grant applications, new skills are needed to explain medical challenges to the crowd through video messages and social media.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchCrowdsourcingFund RaisingHumansResearch Designbrain tumorcrowdfundingneurosciencesneurosurgeryscience funding

Identifiers

PMID33174857
PMCPMC7688388
OpenAlexW3037223420

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.