Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33174807›Full record

ArticleScandinavian journal of primary health care2020

Elephant in the room - Family members´ perspectives on advance care planning.

Lisa Kastbom, Marit Karlsson, Magnus Falk, Anna Milberg

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scandinavian journal of primary health care, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lisa KastbomDepartment of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Marit KarlssonDepartment of Advanced Home Care in Linköping, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Magnus FalkDepartment of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Anna MilbergDepartment of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Linköping University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo explore family members' experiences of advance care planning in nursing homes.

designIndividual interviews. Thematic analysis.

settingFour nursing homes in Sweden. SUBJECTS: Eighteen family members of deceased nursing home patients.

main outcome measuresFamily members' experiences of advance care planning in nursing homes.

resultsFamily members' experiences of advance care planning in a nursing home context involved five themes:

conclusionOur study stresses the significance of staff involving the patient and family members in the advance care planning process in nursing homes, thereby adapting the care in line with patient's wishes, and for the patient to share these preferences with family members. Education in communication related to the subject may be important to shape advance care planning. Key points Knowledge on advance care planning (ACP) in a nursing home (NH) context from the perspective of family members is limited. Role of the nurse in ACP is seen as central, whereas physician involvement is often perceived to be lacking. Significance of small details, perceive to symbolize staff competence and respect for patient autonomy. To limit family members' feeling of guilt, communicating end-of-life issues is important in order to align ACP with patient preferences.

Indexed as

Advance Care PlanningFamily HealthCommunicationFamilyFemaleHumansMaleNursing HomesSwedenAdvance care planningeducationfamily memberfamily practicenursing homesqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID33174807
PMCPMC7782196
OpenAlexW3106395429

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.