Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33174580›Full record

ArticleLab on a chip2021

Microdissected "cuboids" for microfluidic drug testing of intact tissues.

Lisa F Horowitz, Adan D Rodriguez, Allan Au-Yeung, Kevin W Bishop, Lindsey A Barner, Gargi Mishra, Aashik Raman, Priscilla Delgado, Jonathan T C Liu, Taranjit S Gujral and 4 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Lab on a chip, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Understanding Glioblastoma Dynamics Using 3D Organoids and Engineered Extracellular Matrix.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. BIOPRINTING OF MICRODISSECTED TUMOR "CUBOIDS" IN HYDROGELS.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Microfluidic Modulation of Microvasculature in Microdissected Tumors.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Lisa F HorowitzDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. lisafh@uw.edu.
Adan D Rodriguez
Allan Au-Yeung
Kevin W Bishop
Lindsey A Barner
Gargi Mishra
Aashik Raman
Priscilla Delgado
Jonathan T C Liu
Taranjit S Gujral
Mehdi Mehrabi
Mengsu Yang
Robert H Pierce
Albert Folch
University of Washington · USFred Hutch Cancer Center · USCity University of Hong Kong · HKUniversity of Pretoria · ZA

Funding

Microfluidic Device to Profile Chemosensitivity in Glioma Slice CulturesR01CA181445 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI FOLCH, ALBERT · 2014 to 2025
$5.3M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA181445
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As preclinical animal tests often do not accurately predict drug effects later observed in humans, most drugs under development fail to reach the market. Thus there is a critical need for functional drug testing platforms that use human, intact tissues to complement animal studies. To enable future multiplexed delivery of many drugs to one small biopsy, we have developed a multi-well microfluidic platform that selectively treats cuboidal-shaped microdissected tissues or "cuboids" with well-preserved tissue microenvironments. We create large numbers of uniformly-sized cuboids by semi-automated sectioning of tissue with a commercially available tissue chopper. Here we demonstrate the microdissection method on normal mouse liver, which we characterize with quantitative 3D imaging, and on human glioma xenograft tumors, which we evaluate after time in culture for viability and preservation of the microenvironment. The benefits of size uniformity include lower heterogeneity in future biological assays as well as facilitation of their physical manipulation by automation. Our prototype platform consists of a microfluidic circuit whose hydrodynamic traps immobilize the live cuboids in arrays at the bottom of a multi-well plate. Fluid dynamics simulations enabled the rapid evaluation of design alternatives and operational parameters. We demonstrate the proof-of-concept application of model soluble compounds such as dyes (CellTracker, Hoechst) and the cancer drug cisplatin. Upscaling of the microfluidic platform and microdissection method to larger arrays and numbers of cuboids could lead to direct testing of human tissues at high throughput, and thus could have a significant impact on drug discovery and personalized medicine.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsMicrofluidic Analytical TechniquesNeoplasmsPharmaceutical PreparationsAnimalsDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalMiceMicrofluidicsPrecision MedicineTumor MicroenvironmentAntineoplastic AgentsPharmaceutical Preparations

Identifiers

PMID33174580
PMCPMC8205430
OpenAlexW3104508445

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.