ArticleParasitology research2021
Biomarkers assessment in patients with Chagas disease and systemic arterial hypertension.
Article in Parasitology research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Chagas Disease: A Silent Threat for Dogs and Humans.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Chagas disease (ChD) and systemic arterial hypertension (SAH) are two severe comorbidities that lead to mortality and a reduction in people's quality of life, with an impact on public health. The aim of this study was to quantify the biomarkers of cardiac injury in patients with ChD and SAH. Eighty patients were divided into four groups: 20 hypertensive patients, 20 ChD-hypertensive patients, 20 ChD patients, and 20 normotensive volunteers; all of them came from outpatient's public health services. Among the evaluated markers for cardiac lesions (creatine kinase, creatine kinase-MB isoform, myoglobin, high-sensitive cardiac troponin T[hs-cTnT], B-type natriuretic peptide [BNP], and C-reactive protein), hs-cTnT and BNP were the most appropriate. Importantly, our results showed that the cut off point for hs-cTnT could be < 0.007 ng/mL, which could lead to the early detection of myocardial lesions. The BNP and hs-cTnT levels were high only in the ChD and ChD-hypertensive patient groups, suggesting that Chagas' disease may play an important role in the increase of these biomarkers. ChD patients, hypertensive or not, with cardiac or cardiodigestive involvement presented significantly higher values of hs-cTnT (p < 0.001) and BNP (p = 0.001) than ChD patients with indeterminate and digestive forms, which strengthens the validation of these markers for the follow-up of clinical cardiac form of ChD. This study suggests that the BNP and hs-cTnT can be used as possible indirect biomarkers of cardiac damage. In addition, the reference values of these biomarkers in Chagas and hypertensive cardiomyopathies should be better understood with further studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.