ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2020
Predicting progression to septic shock in the emergency department using an externally generalizable machine learning algorithm.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveMachine-learning (ML) algorithms allow for improved prediction of sepsis syndromes in the ED using data from electronic medical records. Transfer learning, a new subfield of ML, allows for generalizability of an algorithm across clinical sites. We aimed to validate the Artificial Intelligence Sepsis Expert (AISE) for the prediction of delayed septic shock in a cohort of patients treated in the ED and demonstrate the feasibility of transfer learning to improve external validity at a second site.
methodsObservational cohort study utilizing data from over 180,000 patients from two academic medical centers between 2014 and 2019 using multiple definitions of sepsis. The AISE algorithm was trained using 40 input variables at the development site to predict delayed septic shock (occurring greater than 4 hours after ED triage) at varying prediction windows. We then validated the AISE algorithm at a second site using transfer learning to demonstrate generalizability of the algorithm.
resultsWe identified 9354 patients with severe sepsis of which 723 developed septic shock at least 4 hours after triage. The AISE algorithm demonstrated excellent area under the receiver operating curve (>0.8) at 8 and 12 hours for the prediction of delayed septic shock. Transfer learning significantly improved the test characteristics of the AISE algorithm and yielded comparable performance at the validation site.
conclusionsThe AISE algorithm accurately predicted the development of delayed septic shock. The use of transfer learning allowed for significantly improved external validity and generalizability at a second site. Future prospective studies are indicated to evaluate the clinical utility of this model.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.