ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2020
Functional Outcomes of Major Upper Extremity Replantation: A Scoping Review.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Major hand replantation at the carpometacarpal level: A case report.Radiology case reports · 2026Article
- Upper limb replantation: functional disability and quality of life challenges.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2026Article
- Replantation versus transplantation: Where do we stand?European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2024Review
- Patient-reported significant disability after major traumatic upper extremity amputation.The Journal of hand surgery, European volume · 2024Article
- Limb Preservation and Functional Reconstruction after Complete Amputation and Replantation of the Upper Arm and Thigh.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2024Article
- Role of microsurgical techniques combined with Ilizarov techniques in limb salvage and functional reconstruction of thermal‑crush injuries of the hand: A case report.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2024Article
- CAN TEMPORARY ARTERY CATHETERIZATION EXTEND LIMITS OF ISCHEMIA TIME FOR MACROREPLANTATION?Acta ortopedica brasileira · 2023Article
- Major traumatic amputations and replantations of the upper extremity in Germany - National quality reports 2014-2018.JPRAS open · 2022Article
- Positive psychological suggestions improve the self-efficacy, social functioning and mood of patients undergoing replantation.American journal of translational research · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTraumatic upper limb amputations proximal to the carpus are devastating injuries. Existing literature on outcomes following replantation is limited. Our objective was to perform a scoping review of (1) functional outcomes; (2) return to work data; and (3) secondary surgeries required following proximal to carpus replantation.
methodsA literature search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, and CINAHL was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. All studies reporting on functional outcomes, return to work, or secondary surgeries following replant of traumatic proximal to carpus amputation were included.
resultsOf the 753 articles, 13 studies were included, accounting for 136 major upper extremity replants (0 shoulder, 36 arm, 14 elbow, 86 forearm). Average age was 35 (24 -47) years, with average follow-up of 8 years (2 -18). Chen's Functional Criteria was the most common tool for reporting outcomes (10/13). Level of injury was related to functional outcome, with excellent to good Chen scores for replants distal to elbow, and poor Chen scores for replants at or proximal to elbow. Return to work correlated with level of replantation, with successful return for 65% of forearm, 43% of elbow, and 32% of arm replants. A mean of 2.4 secondary procedures were required.
conclusionsThis study provides insight into major upper extremity replantation, to assist in patient counseling and surgical decision making. Good functional outcomes and successful return to work are directly related to level of injury following major upper extremity replant. Patients should be counseled that more than 1 secondary procedure may be required.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.