ArticleCureus2020
Composition and Laboratory Correlation of Commercial Probiotics in India.
Article in Cureus, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Novel Sugar-Free Probiotic Oral Rinse Influences Oral Candida albicans in Children with Down Syndrome Post Complete Oral Rehabilitation: A Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial with 6-Month Follow-Up.Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2026Trial
- Unlocking the health potential of fermented foods: insights from traditional Indian diets.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
- A portable device for probiotic counting and viability assessment based on microfluidic chip and image recognition.iMetaOmics · 2025Article
- Evaluating the Compositional Quality of Probiotics Containing Bacillus clausii in India.Advances in therapy · 2025Article
- Assessing Bacterial Viability and Label Accuracy in Human and Poultry Probiotics Sold in the United Kingdom.Microorganisms · 2025Article
- Combating antibiotic resistance in a one health context: a plethora of frontiers.One health outlook · 2024Review
- Chitosan-coated probiotic nanoparticles mitigate acrylamide-induced toxicity in the Drosophila model.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Antibiofilm Effect of Curcumin onBiomolecules · 2023Article
- Quantitative and qualitative characterization of commercially available oral suspension of probiotic products containing Bacillus Clausii spores.BMC microbiology · 2022Article
- Infection prevention for extremely low birth weight infants in the NICU.Seminars in fetal & neonatal medicine · 2022Review
- Microbiological Testing of Probiotic Preparations.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Review
- Microbiological Quality and Resistance to an Artificial Gut Environment of Two Probiotic Formulations.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Evaluation of Dietary Supplements Containing Viable Bacteria by Cultivation/MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry and PCR Identification.Frontiers in microbiology · 2021Article
- Spotlight on the Compositional Quality of Probiotic Formulations Marketed Worldwide.Frontiers in microbiology · 2021Review
- Current understanding of antibiotic-associated dysbiosis and approaches for its management.Therapeutic advances in infectious diseaseReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives Probiotics are defined as live microorganisms that, when administered in adequate amounts, confer health benefits to the host. Probiotics are currently being recommended and considered for many medical conditions. The Asia-Pacific region contributes to more than 40% of the global industry. Quality of commercial probiotics remains a challenge globally and has been a major concern in various countries in Europe, South Africa, Taiwan, India, Pakistan, and the USA. Research from these countries indicate that the contents do not correspond to the label information in terms of identity, viability, number of microorganisms or purity. The objective of this study is to assess the commercial probiotic bacterial contents and their label accuracy in India. No previous research has been done in this area in India, on commercial probiotics that are sold as "pharmaceuticals". Methods A random selection of the most prescribed probiotics for various clinical indications were chosen with a minimum shelf life of 12 months. The probiotics were single and multiple strains and these were evaluated by culture, viable plate count, DNA isolation and targeted metagenomics. Our study is the first step in scrutinizing probiotics in terms of quality and quantity analysis which are used across various age groups for multiple indications. Results Out of the 20 chosen probiotics eight products were single strain and 12 products were multiple strains. These probiotics showed very poor correlation between the declared contents on the pack and lab values in viable cell count colonies, the genus and species strain identification, presence of contaminants and these were confirmed with 16s RNA and next generation sequencing. Conclusion Poor correlation in the quality and quantity of probiotics proves that the label claim and actual claim of these "drugs" show exceptionally poor correlation and raises safety concerns in clinical use, especially in vulnerable age groups such as neonates, children and the elderly. Our study shows that "policing" of these probiotics is essential in protecting these patients who are at risk and ensuring quality control and helping clinicians making the right choice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.