ArticleCureus2020
The Effectiveness of Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy as Salvage Treatment for Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss: A Retrospective Study.
Article in Cureus, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy for Idiopathic Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss: Factors Affecting Benefits of Earlier Start and Longer Treatment Duration.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Hyperbaric oxygen therapy for sudden sensorineural hearing loss (Review).Molecular medicine reports · 2025Review
- Idiopathic Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss: Is Hyperbaric Oxygen Treatment the Sooner and Longer, the Better?Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Article
- Efficacy evaluation and clinical value exploration of secondary inpatient treatment for total deafness-type SSNHL: a single-center prospective study.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL) is a medical emergency; its etiology is unknown in most cases, The treatment, in turn, is empiric and usually consists of various pharmacological agents, mainly steroids. Hyperbaric oxygen (HBO) therapy is used routinely as salvage therapy for refractory SSNHL. While several studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of HBO therapy as salvage treatment for refractory SSNHL, its results have varied among studies, and its efficacy is still unclear. Aim We aimed to stratify the effect of HBO therapy as salvage treatment after the failure of steroid therapy for SSNHL. Method This is a retrospective case series that involved eight SSNHL patients in the past three years at King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre (KFSHRC) in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Patients' records were reviewed and statistical analysis was performed. Results Eight patients were included in this case series; six of them were males, and the mean age of all patients was 46.88 ±20.9 years. One patient had herpes zoster as the cause of SSNHL and seven patients' disease was of unknown etiology. The mean period for the onset of disease was 4.12 ±2.17 days. One patient was managed with intravenous dexamethasone and the other patients were managed with oral steroids, and all patients were then treated by HBO therapy. Of the patients, two showed significant improvement but the others did not. The cause of SSNHL, age of patients, HBO start and cessation, comorbidities, and disease onset did not affect the improvement in disease in patients (p: ˃0.05). Conclusion Moderate-to-severe cases of SSNHL can be improved by HBO treatment along with oral steroids, while this therapy was ineffective in severe and profound cases. No factors could be found to predict improvement in patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.