ReviewCureus2020
Post-Marketing Experience of Edaravone in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: A Clinical Perspective and Comparison With the Clinical Trials of the Drug.
Review in Cureus, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Oxidative Stress: Pathological Driver in Chronic Neurodegenerative Diseases.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Therapeutic Effects of Combination of Nebivolol and Donepezil: Targeting Multifactorial Mechanisms in ALS.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2023Article
- Towards a Machine Learning Empowered Prognostic Model for Predicting Disease Progression for Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2023Article
- Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Pathoetiology and Pathophysiology: Roles of Astrocytes, Gut Microbiome, and Muscle Interactions via the Mitochondrial Melatonergic Pathway, with Disruption by Glyphosate-Based Herbicides.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Analysis of the US Safety Data for Edaravone (RadicavaDrugs in R&D · 2022Article
- Use of Riluzole for the Treatment of Hereditary Ataxias: A Systematic Review.Brain sciences · 2022Review
- Ethnical Disparities in Response to Edaravone in Patients With Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis.Cureus · 2022Review
- Neuronal Hyperexcitability and Free Radical Toxicity in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: Established and Future Targets.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Effects of the Edaravone, a Drug Approved for the Treatment of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, on Mitochondrial Function and Neuroprotection.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- NADBiomedicines · 2021Review
- Neuroprotective Effect of Daidzein Extracted FromFrontiers in pharmacology · 2021Article
- Current Drug Repurposing Strategies for Rare Neurodegenerative Disorders.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a rapidly progressive neurodegenerative disease that affects the upper and lower motor neurons. Currently, the only treatment for ALS is riluzole, which only has a limited effect on increasing survival from 3 to 6 months. New therapies are needed in the clinical setting for ALS. We aim to compare and contrast the clinical trials of edaravone and the post-marketing experience of the drug during this study. For the method, a search strategy was made using PubMed with the search terms "Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis" (MeSH) and "Edaravone" (MeSH). For inclusion criteria, we used full papers, studies involving humans, and studies published in the English language. We exclude meta-analyses, literature reviews, systematic reviews, studies involving animals, and studies not published in English. After close examination, 20 papers were used for the discussion in this review. The clinical trials showed efficacy in patients in reducing the revised ALS functional rating scale (ALSFRS-R) in patients with early ALS with selective criteria. We documented edaravone's post-marketing experience in six countries: Kuwait, South Korea, Argentina, United States, Israel, and Italy. During the study we analyzed, the forced vital capacity (FVC) and ALSFRS-R scored, together with edaravone's safety in the clinical trials and post-marketing experience. Edaravone seems to be more effective in Asia, where the ALSFRS-R scores and the FVC decline were similar to the clinical trial results in Japan. Studies in Europe did not find the drug clinically useful. At the same time, studies in United States and Argentina were mainly descriptive, so more information is needed to evaluate the drug's efficacy in that part of the world. The drug was well-tolerated in all studies. In conclusion, more studies need to be done worldwide to carry out and clarify the effectiveness of edaravone in the clinical setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.