Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33173626›Full record

ReviewCureus2020

Post-Marketing Experience of Edaravone in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: A Clinical Perspective and Comparison With the Clinical Trials of the Drug.

Juan Fernando Ortiz, Sawleha Arshi Khan, Amr Salem, Zayar Lin, Zafar Iqbal, Nusrat Jahan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Therapeutic Effects of Combination of Nebivolol and Donepezil: Targeting Multifactorial Mechanisms in ALS.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. NADBiomedicines · 2021
    Review
  12. Neuroprotective Effect of Daidzein Extracted FromFrontiers in pharmacology · 2021
    Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Juan Fernando OrtizNeurology, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Sawleha Arshi KhanResearch, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Amr SalemHospital Medicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Zayar LinInternal Medicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Zafar IqbalEmergency Medicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Nusrat JahanInternal Medicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a rapidly progressive neurodegenerative disease that affects the upper and lower motor neurons. Currently, the only treatment for ALS is riluzole, which only has a limited effect on increasing survival from 3 to 6 months. New therapies are needed in the clinical setting for ALS. We aim to compare and contrast the clinical trials of edaravone and the post-marketing experience of the drug during this study. For the method, a search strategy was made using PubMed with the search terms "Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis" (MeSH) and "Edaravone" (MeSH). For inclusion criteria, we used full papers, studies involving humans, and studies published in the English language. We exclude meta-analyses, literature reviews, systematic reviews, studies involving animals, and studies not published in English. After close examination, 20 papers were used for the discussion in this review. The clinical trials showed efficacy in patients in reducing the revised ALS functional rating scale (ALSFRS-R) in patients with early ALS with selective criteria. We documented edaravone's post-marketing experience in six countries: Kuwait, South Korea, Argentina, United States, Israel, and Italy. During the study we analyzed, the forced vital capacity (FVC) and ALSFRS-R scored, together with edaravone's safety in the clinical trials and post-marketing experience. Edaravone seems to be more effective in Asia, where the ALSFRS-R scores and the FVC decline were similar to the clinical trial results in Japan. Studies in Europe did not find the drug clinically useful. At the same time, studies in United States and Argentina were mainly descriptive, so more information is needed to evaluate the drug's efficacy in that part of the world. The drug was well-tolerated in all studies. In conclusion, more studies need to be done worldwide to carry out and clarify the effectiveness of edaravone in the clinical setting.

Indexed as

amyotrophic lateral sclerosisedaravone.

Identifiers

PMID33173626
PMCPMC7645306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.