Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33173598›Full record

ArticleActa naturae

Molecular Principles of Insect Chemoreception.

E L Sokolinskaya, D V Kolesov, K A Lukyanov, A M Bogdanov

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta naturae. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Oviposition Deterrent and Larvicidal Activity ofTropical medicine and infectious disease · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. MCMV-infected maize attracts its insect vectorFrontiers in plant science · 2024
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

E L SokolinskayaShemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Moscow, 117997 Russia.
D V KolesovShemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Moscow, 117997 Russia.
K A LukyanovShemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Moscow, 117997 Russia.
A M BogdanovShemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Moscow, 117997 Russia.
Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry · BYInstitute of Bioorganic Chemistry · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chemoreception, an ability to perceive specific chemical stimuli, is one of the most evolutionarily ancient forms of interaction between living organisms and their environment. Chemoreception systems are found in organisms belonging to all biological kingdoms. In higher multicellular animals, chemoreception (along with photo- and mechanoreception) underlies the functioning of five traditional senses. Insects have developed a peculiar and one of the most sophisticated chemoreception systems, which exploits at least three receptor superfamilies providing perception of smell and taste, as well as chemical communication in these animals. The enormous diversity of physiologically relevant compounds in the environment has given rise to a wide-ranging repertoire of chemoreceptors of various specificities. Thus, in insects, they are represented by several structurally and functionally distinct protein classes and are encoded by hundreds of genes. In the current review, we briefly characterize the insect chemoreception system by describing the main groups of receptors that constitute it and putting emphasis on the peculiar architecture and mechanisms of functioning possessed by these molecules.

Indexed as

action potentialcation channelchemoreceptorgustatory receptorinsectsionotropic receptormetabotropic receptorodorantolfaction

Identifiers

PMID33173598
PMCPMC7604898
OpenAlexW3096339544

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.