Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33173516›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in psychiatry2020

Selective Review of Neuroimaging Findings in Youth at Clinical High Risk for Psychosis: On the Path to Biomarkers for Conversion.

Justin K Ellis, Elaine F Walker, David R Goldsmith

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. A Review of Potential Neuroimaging Biomarkers of Schizophrenia-Risk.Journal of psychiatry and brain science · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Justin K EllisDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Elaine F WalkerDepartment of Psychology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States.
David R GoldsmithDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Emory University · US

Funding

Emory Psychiatry Clinical Scientist Training Program (CSTP)R25MH101079 · NIMH · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI GOLDSMITH, DAVID RYAN, MILLER, ANDREW H · 2014 to 2025
$1.9M
Impact of Inflammation on Reward Circuits, Motivational Deficits and Negative Symptoms in SchizophreniaK23MH114037 · NIMH · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI GOLDSMITH, DAVID RYAN · 2018 to 2022
$957k
NIMH NIH HHS K23 MH114037NIMH NIH HHS L30 MH114414NIMH NIH HHS R25 MH101079
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

First episode psychosis (FEP), and subsequent diagnosis of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder, predominantly occurs during late adolescence, is accompanied by a significant decline in function and represents a traumatic experience for patients and families alike. Prior to first episode psychosis, most patients experience a prodromal period of 1-2 years, during which symptoms first appear and then progress. During that time period, subjects are referred to as being at Clinical High Risk (CHR), as a prodromal period can only be designated in hindsight in those who convert. The clinical high-risk period represents a critical window during which interventions may be targeted to slow or prevent conversion to psychosis. However, only one third of subjects at clinical high risk will convert to psychosis and receive a formal diagnosis of a primary psychotic disorder. Therefore, in order for targeted interventions to be developed and applied, predicting who among this population will convert is of critical importance. To date, a variety of neuroimaging modalities have identified numerous differences between CHR subjects and healthy controls. However, complicating attempts at predicting conversion are increasingly recognized co-morbidities, such as major depressive disorder, in a significant number of CHR subjects. The result of this is that phenotypes discovered between CHR subjects and healthy controls are likely non-specific to psychosis and generalized for major mental illness. In this paper, we selectively review evidence for neuroimaging phenotypes in CHR subjects who later converted to psychosis. We then evaluate the recent landscape of machine learning as it relates to neuroimaging phenotypes in predicting conversion to psychosis.

Indexed as

clinical high riskMRIneuroimagingPETprodromepsychosisschizophrenia

Identifiers

PMID33173516
PMCPMC7538833
OpenAlexW3088490289

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.