Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33173305›Full record

ArticleJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2020

Development and Validation of Psychological Contract Scale for Hospital Pharmacists.

Ting Zhang, Chengchen Yin, Yongchen Geng, Yan Zhou, Shusen Sun, Fushan Tang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ting Zhang *Department of Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi 563006, People's Republic of China.
Chengchen Yin *Department of Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi 563006, People's Republic of China.
Yongchen GengDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi 563006, People's Republic of China.
Yan ZhouDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi 563006, People's Republic of China.
Shusen SunCollege of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Western New England University, Springfield, MA 01119, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9014-7329
Fushan TangDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi 563006, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0001-8779-1041

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo set up a psychological contract scale for hospital pharmacists to strengthen the management of pharmacists and improve the occupational health of pharmacists.

methodsA psychological contract scale for hospital pharmacists with structured questionnaires was designed according to the professional characteristics of hospital pharmacists and validated through the investigation of pharmacists in 77 public medical institutions in Zunyi, China, which were included through stratified random sampling. Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) Measure of Sampling Adequacy and Bartlett's Test of Sphericity were used to assess the suitability of the sample for factor analysis. Validity of the dimensions was investigated with exploratory factor analysis. The principal component analysis and varimax rotation methods were used to identify the factor structure. The internal consistency was assessed by the Cronbach's alpha coefficient.

resultsThe psychological contract scale for hospital pharmacists was composed of pharmacists' perceptions regarding the hospital, pharmacists themselves, and government/society responsibility. The KMO values of the three perceptions were 0.957, 0.930 and 0.917, respectively, all greater than 0.6. The significance probability of the Bartlett spherical test was 0.000, indicating good structural validity. The Cronbach's alpha coefficient and half coefficient of the responsibilities in three sub-scales were all greater than 0.6, indicating good internal reliability of the scale. The average scores of the pharmacist responsibility, the hospital responsibility and the government/society responsibility in the pharmacists' perception were 5.42±0.637, 4.64±1.069 and 4.49±1.134, respectively. In the pharmacists' perception, their own responsibility has been better fulfilled than those of hospitals and government/society.

conclusionThe psychological contract scale for hospital pharmacists can be a useful tool to evaluate the psychological contract of hospital pharmacists for research and occupational health assessments and management in the area of hospital pharmacy.

Indexed as

pharmacistpsychological contractquestionnaire

Identifiers

PMID33173305
PMCPMC7646407

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.