Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33173157›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Improving single pixel imaging performance in high noise condition by under-sampling.

Fangyuan Sha, Sujit Kumar Sahoo, Huy Quoc Lam, Beng Koon Ng, Cuong Dang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Fangyuan ShaCentre for Optoelectronics and Biophotonics (COEB), School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, The Photonics Institute (TPI), Nanyang Technological University Singapore, 50 Nanyang Avenue, Singapore, 639798, Singapore.
Sujit Kumar SahooCentre for Optoelectronics and Biophotonics (COEB), School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, The Photonics Institute (TPI), Nanyang Technological University Singapore, 50 Nanyang Avenue, Singapore, 639798, Singapore.
Huy Quoc LamTemasek Laboratories @ Nanyang Technological University Singapore, 50 Nanyang Avenue, Singapore, 639798, Singapore.
Beng Koon NgCentre for Optoelectronics and Biophotonics (COEB), School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, The Photonics Institute (TPI), Nanyang Technological University Singapore, 50 Nanyang Avenue, Singapore, 639798, Singapore.
Cuong DangCentre for Optoelectronics and Biophotonics (COEB), School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, The Photonics Institute (TPI), Nanyang Technological University Singapore, 50 Nanyang Avenue, Singapore, 639798, Singapore. hcdang@ntu.edu.sg.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Single-pixel imaging could be a superior solution for imaging applications where the detector array is very expensive or not even available. Sampling order, sampling ratio, noise and type of transforms affect the quality of the reconstructed image. Here, we compare the performance of single pixel imaging (SPI) with Hadamard transform (HT) and discrete cosine transform (DCT) in the presence of noise. The trade-off between adding image information and adding noise in each coefficient measurement results in an optimum number of measurements for reconstruction image quality. In addition, DCT shows higher image quality with fewer measurements than HT does. We then demonstrate our SPI with optimum sampling strategy for a large set of images and lab experiments and finally put forward a quality control technique, which is corroborated by the practical experiments. Our results suggest a practical approach for SPI to improve the speed and achieve the highest possible image quality.

Identifiers

PMID33173157
PMCPMC7656256

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.