ArticleScientific reports2020
From bridges to cycles in spectroscopic networks.
Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- ReSpecTh: Reaction kinetics, spectroscopy, and thermochemical datasets.Scientific data · 2025Article
- Verification labels for rovibronic quantum-state energy uncertainties.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Empirical rovibronic energy levels of CMolecular physics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Spectroscopic networks provide a particularly useful representation of observed rovibronic transitions of molecules, as well as of related quantum states, whereby the states form a set of vertices connected by the measured transitions forming a set of edges. Among their several uses, SNs offer a practical framework to assess data in line-by-line spectroscopic databases. They can be utilized to help detect flawed transition entries. Methods which achieve this validation work for transitions taking part in at least one cycle in a measured spectroscopic network but they do not work for bridges. The concept of two-edge-connectivity of graph theory, introduced here to high-resolution spectroscopy, offers an elegant approach that facilitates putting the maximum number of bridges, if not all, into at least one cycle. An algorithmic solution is shown how to augment an existing spectroscopic network with a minimum number of new spectroscopic measurements selected according to well-defined guidelines. In relation to this, two metrics are introduced, ranking measurements based on their utility toward achieving the goal of two-edge-connectivity. Utility of the new concepts are demonstrated on spectroscopic data of [Formula: see text].
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.