ArticleScientific reports2020
Enhancing protein backbone angle prediction by using simpler models of deep neural networks.
Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Protein Science Meets Artificial Intelligence: A Systematic Review and a Biochemical Meta-Analysis of an Inter-Field.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Pooled it
- Structure-based protein and small molecule generation using EGNN and diffusion models: A comprehensive review.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024Review
- Parameterized hypercomplex convolutional network for accurate protein backbone torsion angle prediction.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Naive Prediction of Protein Backbone Phi and Psi Dihedral Angles Using Deep Learning.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Interpretable Machine Learning of Amino Acid Patterns in Proteins: A Statistical Ensemble Approach.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2023Article
- Beyond sequence: Structure-based machine learning.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023Review
- Enhancing protein inter-residue real distance prediction by scrutinising deep learning models.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Secondary structure specific simpler prediction models for protein backbone angles.BMC bioinformatics · 2022Article
- How sticky are our proteins? Quantifying hydrophobicity of the human proteome.Bioinformatics advances · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Protein structure prediction is a grand challenge. Prediction of protein structures via the representations using backbone dihedral angles has recently achieved significant progress along with the on-going surge of deep neural network (DNN) research in general. However, we observe that in the protein backbone angle prediction research, there is an overall trend to employ more and more complex neural networks and then to throw more and more features to the neural networks. While more features might add more predictive power to the neural network, we argue that redundant features could rather clutter the scenario and more complex neural networks then just could counterbalance the noise. From artificial intelligence and machine learning perspectives, problem representations and solution approaches do mutually interact and thus affect performance. We also argue that comparatively simpler predictors can more easily be reconstructed than the more complex ones. With these arguments in mind, we present a deep learning method named Simpler Angle Predictor (SAP) to train simpler DNN models that enhance protein backbone angle prediction. We then empirically show that SAP can significantly outperform existing state-of-the-art methods on well-known benchmark datasets: for some types of angles, the differences are 6-8 in terms of mean absolute error (MAE). The SAP program along with its data is available from the website https://gitlab.com/mahnewton/sap .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.