Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33173114›Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2020

The influence of induction speed on the frontal (processed) EEG.

D P Obert, P Sepúlveda, S Kratzer, G Schneider, M Kreuzer

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

D P ObertTechnical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Munich, Germany.
P SepúlvedaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Hospital Base San José, Osorno/Universidad Austral, Valdivia, Chile.
S KratzerTechnical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Munich, Germany.
G SchneiderTechnical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Munich, Germany.
M KreuzerTechnical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Munich, Germany. m.kreuzer@tum.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The intravenous injection of the anaesthetic propofol is clinical routine to induce loss of responsiveness (LOR). However, there are only a few studies investigating the influence of the injection rate on the frontal electroencephalogram (EEG) during LOR. Therefore, we focused on changes of the frontal EEG especially during this period. We included 18 patients which were randomly assigned to a slow or fast induction group and recorded the frontal EEG. Based on this data, we calculated the power spectral density, the band powers and band ratios. To analyse the behaviour of processed EEG parameters we calculated the beta ratio, the spectral entropy, and the spectral edge frequency. Due to the prolonged induction period in the slow injection group we were able to distinguish loss of responsiveness to verbal command (LOvR) from loss of responsiveness to painful stimulus (LOpR) whereas in the fast induction group we could not. At LOpR, we observed a higher relative alpha and beta power in the slow induction group while the relative power in the delta range was lower than in the fast induction group. When concentrating on the slow induction group the increase in relative alpha power pre-LOpR and even before LOvR indicated that frontal EEG patterns, which have been suggested as an indicator of unconsciousness, can develop before LOR. Further, LOvR was best reflected by an increase of the alpha to delta ratio, and LOpR was indicated by a decrease of the beta to alpha ratio. These findings highlight the different spectral properties of the EEG at various levels of responsiveness and underline the influence of the propofol injection rate on the frontal EEG during induction of general anesthesia.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAlpha RhythmAnesthesia, GeneralAnesthetics, IntravenousBeta RhythmElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPropofolUnconsciousnessYoung AdultAnesthetics, IntravenousPropofol

Identifiers

PMID33173114
PMCPMC7655958

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.