Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33173042›Full record

SynthesisTranslational psychiatry2020

Recovering from depression with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS): a systematic review and meta-analysis of preclinical studies.

Luisa De Risio, Marta Borgi, Mauro Pettorruso, Andrea Miuli, Angela Maria Ottomana, Antonella Sociali, Giovanni Martinotti, Giuseppe Nicolò, Simone Macrì, Massimo di Giannantonio and 1 more

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Translational psychiatry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 69 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
69citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05296915 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Bulimia Nervosa e Binge Eating Disorder: Strategie Terapeutiche a Confronto

TypeinterventionalSponsorFondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore PoliclinicoRan2022 to 2024Enrolled30ConditionsBulimia Nervosa, Binge-Eating DisorderArmstVNS, rTMS, CBT-E
NCT07474974 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Illuminating Depression: ipRGC as a Potential Biomarker for Predicting Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Treatment Response in Major Depressive Disorder

TypeinterventionalSponsorPolytechnic Institute of PortoRan2026 to 2027Enrolled44ConditionsDepression - Major Depressive Disorder, Treatment Resistant DepressionArmsRepetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

69 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 125 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Early efficacy of rTMS intervention at week 2 predicts subsequent responses at week 24 in schizophrenia in a randomized controlled trial.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2024
    Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Luisa De RisioDepartment of Psychiatry and Addiction, ASL Roma 5, Colleferro, Rome, Italy.
Marta BorgiCenter for Behavioral Sciences and Mental Health, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy.
Mauro PettorrusoDepartment of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, "G. d' Annunzio" University, Chieti, Italy. mauro.pettorruso@unich.it.ORCID 0000-0002-4164-3040
Andrea MiuliDepartment of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, "G. d' Annunzio" University, Chieti, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2431-0460
Angela Maria OttomanaCenter for Behavioral Sciences and Mental Health, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy.
Antonella SocialiDepartment of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, "G. d' Annunzio" University, Chieti, Italy.
Giovanni MartinottiDepartment of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, "G. d' Annunzio" University, Chieti, Italy.
Giuseppe NicolòDepartment of Psychiatry and Addiction, ASL Roma 5, Colleferro, Rome, Italy.
Simone MacrìCenter for Behavioral Sciences and Mental Health, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2946-4784
Massimo di GiannantonioDepartment of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, "G. d' Annunzio" University, Chieti, Italy.
Francesca ZorattoCenter for Behavioral Sciences and Mental Health, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3626-8928
Istituto Superiore di Sanità · ITUniversity of Chieti-Pescara · ITASL Roma · ITUniversity of Hertfordshire · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has gained growing interest for the treatment of major depression (MDD) and treatment-resistant depression (TRD). Most knowledge on rTMS comes from human studies as preclinical application has been problematic. However, recent optimization of rTMS in animal models has laid the foundations for improved translational studies. Preclinical studies have the potential to help identify optimal stimulation protocols and shed light on new neurobiological-based rationales for rTMS use. To assess existing evidence regarding rTMS effects on depressive-like symptoms in rodent models, we conducted a comprehensive literature search in accordance with PRISMA guidelines (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42019157549). In addition, we conducted a meta-analysis to determine rTMS efficacy, performing subgroup analyses to examine the impact of different experimental models and neuromodulation parameters. Assessment of the depressive-like phenotype was quite homogeneous whilst rTMS parameters among the 23 included studies varied considerably. Most studies used a stress-induced model. Overall, results show a largely beneficial effect of active rTMS compared to sham stimulation, as reflected in the statistically significant recovery of both helplessness (SDM 1.34 [1.02;1.66]) and anhedonic (SDM 1.87 [1.02;2.72]) profiles. Improvement of the depressive-like phenotype was obtained in all included models and independently of rTMS frequency. Nonetheless, these results have limited predictive value for TRD patients as only antidepressant-sensitive models were used. Extending rTMS studies to other MDD models, corresponding to distinct endophenotypes, and to TRD models is therefore crucial to test rTMS efficacy and to develop cost-effective protocols, with the potential of yielding faster clinical responses in MDD and TRD.

Indexed as

Depressive Disorder, Treatment-ResistantMajor Depressive DisorderAntidepressive AgentsDepressionHumansTranscranial Magnetic StimulationTreatment OutcomeAntidepressive Agents

Identifiers

PMID33173042
PMCPMC7655822
OpenAlexW3098215128

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.