Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33172981›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2020

Layer- and Cell Type-Specific Response Properties of Gustatory Cortex Neurons in Awake Mice.

Gulce Nazli Dikecligil, Dustin M Graham, Il Memming Park, Alfredo Fontanini

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Cortical Coding of Gustatory and Thermal Signals in Active Licking Mice.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptors in the Gustatory Cortex Influence Food Intake.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Active Licking Shapes Cortical Taste Coding.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Cortical Hub for Flavor Sensation in Rodents.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gulce Nazli DikecligilDepartment of Neurobiology and Behavior and Program in Neuroscience, State University of New York at Stony Brook, Stony Brook, New York 11794 nazdikec@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.
Dustin M GrahamDepartment of Neurobiology and Behavior and Program in Neuroscience, State University of New York at Stony Brook, Stony Brook, New York 11794.
Il Memming ParkDepartment of Neurobiology and Behavior and Program in Neuroscience, State University of New York at Stony Brook, Stony Brook, New York 11794.ORCID 0000-0002-4255-7750
Alfredo FontaniniDepartment of Neurobiology and Behavior and Program in Neuroscience, State University of New York at Stony Brook, Stony Brook, New York 11794.
State University of New York · US

Funding

Laminar differences in taste coding: a circuit perspectiveR01DC015234 · NIDCD · STATE UNIVERSITY NEW YORK STONY BROOK · PI FONTANINI, ALFREDO, MAFFEI, ARIANNA · 2016 to 2020
$2.0M
Cellular and synaptic mechanisms of cortical taste coding in awake-behaving miceF32DC012461 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI GRAHAM, DUSTIN M · 2012 to 2014
$169k
NIDCD NIH HHS F32 DC012461NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC015234
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studies in visual, auditory, and somatosensory cortices have revealed that different cell types as well as neurons located in different laminae display distinct stimulus response profiles. The extent to which these layer and cell type-specific distinctions generalize to gustatory cortex (GC) remains unknown. In this study, we performed extracellular recordings in adult female mice to monitor the activity of putative pyramidal and inhibitory neurons located in deep and superficial layers of GC. Awake, head-restrained mice were trained to lick different tastants (sucrose, salt, citric acid, quinine, and water) from a lick spout. We found that deep layer neurons show higher baseline firing rates (FRs) in GC with deep-layer inhibitory neurons displaying highest FRs at baseline and following the stimulus. GC's activity shows robust modulations before animals' contact with tastants, and this phenomenon is most prevalent in deep-layer inhibitory neurons. Furthermore, we show that licking activity strongly shapes the spiking pattern of GC pyramidal neurons, eliciting phase-locked spiking across trials and tastants. We demonstrate that there is a greater percentage of taste-coding neurons in deep versus superficial layers with chemosensitive neurons across all categories showing similar breadth of tuning, but different decoding performance. Lastly, we provide evidence for functional convergence in GC, with neurons that can show prestimulus activity, licking-related rhythmicity and taste responses. Overall, our results demonstrate that baseline and stimulus-evoked firing profiles of GC neurons and their processing schemes change as a function of cortical layer and cell type in awake mice.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAnimalsFemaleMiceNeural InhibitionNeuronsSomatosensory CortexTasteTaste Perceptionbehaviorcortexinsular cortexlickingtaste

Identifiers

PMID33172981
PMCPMC7726536
OpenAlexW3099677047

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.