Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33172958›Full record

ReviewESMO open2020

Discussing motherhood when the oncological prognosis is dire: ethical considerations for physicians.

Alma Linkeviciute, Barbara Buonomo, Nicola Fazio, Francesca Spada, Fedro A Peccatori

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ESMO open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alma LinkeviciuteDepartment of Gynaecologic Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milano, Italy.
Barbara BuonomoDepartment of Gynaecologic Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milano, Italy.
Nicola FazioDivision of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology and Neuroendocrine Tumors, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milano, Italy.
Francesca SpadaDivision of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology and Neuroendocrine Tumors, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milano, Italy.
Fedro A PeccatoriDepartment of Gynaecologic Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milano, Italy. Electronic address: fedro.peccatori@ieo.it.
European Institute of Oncology · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Physicians are increasingly open to discussing and supporting pregnancy after cancer treatment. However, counselling patients who are seeking pregnancy despite advanced oncological disease and/or uncertain prognosis is still challenging. Two paradigmatic cases are presented and analysed to illustrate the ethical uneasiness faced by treating physicians when seriously ill patients seek fertility preservation and/or pregnancy. Review of ethical issues is built around the four principles of biomedical ethics. Respect for patients autonomy in relation to managing realistic expectations and avoiding giving patients false hopes opens the analysis. It is followed by considering fair allocation of resources and meaningful distinction between protecting patients from harm and contributing to their welfare. Responsibilities towards the unborn child are discussed in a light of maternal and fetal interdependency. Respecting personal autonomy requires abstaining from controlling inferences to the individual patient's choices, but it does not mean that patients should be left on their own to pick and choose their disease management approaches without advice and guidance from healthcare professionals. Physicians should reason evaluating the potential harms and checking if benefits will outweigh the risks and if costs will produce the best overall results. Responsibilities towards the unborn child can be managed by balancing the respect for maternal autonomy and beneficence for pregnant woman and her fetus. The oncologist cannot determine how patients should view their disease but with empathy and compassion can help them understand the logical rationale behind clinical advice.

Indexed as

Personal AutonomyPhysiciansBeneficenceChildFemaleHumansPregnancyPregnant PeoplePrognosisadvanced cancercounsellingethicsfertility preservationmetastatic cancermotherhoodpregnancy

Identifiers

PMID33172958
PMCPMC7656910
OpenAlexW3103363210

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.