ArticleBMJ open2020
Economic costs of infertility care for patients in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review protocol.
Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- More than a medical condition: a theoretical exploration of infertility's hidden burden.BMC public health · 2026Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Nutrition and reproductive potential of women in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ global health · 2025Pooled it
- Scientific landscape and visualization analysis of the link between adenomyosis and infertility from 2000 to 2024.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Timed intercourse for couples trying to conceive.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Pooled it
- Association of sperm DNA fragmentation with abstinence duration, seminal oxidative stress and age: a call to consider abstinence in andrological diagnostics.Frontiers in urology · 2026Article
- Factors influencing infertile couples' decisions to seek healthcare: A mixed methods study from Islamabad, Pakistan.PLOS global public health · 2026Article
- Trends in Burden of Female Infertility During 1990-2021: An Analysis of Data from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021.International journal of women's health · 2026Article
- Medical crowdfunding for cancer patients seeking fertility treatments: a cross-sectional analysis.F&S reports · 2025Article
- Association between the dietary index for gut microbiota and female infertility: a cross-sectional study of NHANES 2013-2018.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Article
- Integrating salpingoscopy and immunohistochemistry to improve tubal infertility diagnosis: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in reproductive health · 2025Article
- Article
- Policy action points and approaches to promote fertility care in The Gambia: Findings from a mixed-methods study.PloS one · 2024Article
- Ethical analysis of a case of treatment refusal: respect for patients' autonomy in the context of the Iranian clinical environment.Journal of medical ethics and history of medicine · 2024Article
- The search for the principle of justice for infertile couples: characterization of the brazilian population and bioethical discussion.BMC medical ethics · 2023Observational
- Financial costs of assisted reproductive technology for patients in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review.Human reproduction open · 2023Article
- Pathogenesis of Human Adenomyosis: Current Understanding and Its Association with Infertility.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- Health Information Needs of Couples Undergoing Assisted Reproductive Techniques.Iranian journal of nursing and midwifery researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
introductionInfertility, a condition of the reproductive system, affects millions of individuals and couples worldwide. Despite infertility treatment's existence, it is largely unavailable and inaccessible in low/middle-income countries (LMICs) due to the prohibitive costs compounded by an absence of financing. Previous systematic reviews have shown that there is scanty information in LMICs on out-of-pocket (OOP) payments for infertility treatment. This protocol outlines the methodological approach and analytical process to appraise the extent of economic burden due to payments for infertility care services in LMICs. METHOD AND ANALYSIS: Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses approach, we will primarily search for articles indexed in PubMed, Web of Science, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature, EconLit and PsycINFO databases. Grey literature from relevant organisations' virtual libraries shall also be searched. Backward and forward searches on the articles selected will also be done. Quantitative studies on infertility treatment costs from LMICs across the world regions within the last 20 years will be considered. The primary outcome of interest shall include OOP payments, catastrophic health expenditure and direct costs for infertility services. Conversely, informal payments and indirect costs related to infertility treatments shall be considered as secondary outcomes. Integrated quality Criteria for Review Of Multiple Study designs will be used to assess the quality of the studies included in the review. Meta-analysis shall be considered if sufficient studies identified are homogenous in characteristics. Also, the review shall analyse the average cost of infertility treatment against the respective countries' economic indicators like gross domestic product per capita if data permit. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Research and ethics approval will not be required given this will be a review of published articles on the subject. The findings shall be disseminated through publication in a peer-reviewed journal and presentation to the WHO and its partners. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020199312.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.