Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33172951›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

Economic costs of infertility care for patients in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review protocol.

Purity Njagi, Wim Groot, Jelena Arsenijevic, Silke Dyer, Gitau Mburu, James Kiarie

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Timed intercourse for couples trying to conceive.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Purity NjagiMaastricht Graduate School of Governance, United Nations University-MERIT/Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands p.njagi@student.maastrichtuniversity.nl.ORCID 0000-0003-3157-4413
Wim GrootMaastricht Graduate School of Governance, United Nations University-MERIT/Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Jelena ArsenijevicSchool of Governance, Faculty of Law, Economics and Governance, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Silke DyerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Gitau MburuDepartment of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research (SHR), World Health Organization, Geneve, Switzerland.
James KiarieDepartment of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research (SHR), World Health Organization, Geneve, Switzerland.
United Nations University – Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology · NLWorld Health Organization · CHUniversity of Cape Town · ZAUtrecht University · NL

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionInfertility, a condition of the reproductive system, affects millions of individuals and couples worldwide. Despite infertility treatment's existence, it is largely unavailable and inaccessible in low/middle-income countries (LMICs) due to the prohibitive costs compounded by an absence of financing. Previous systematic reviews have shown that there is scanty information in LMICs on out-of-pocket (OOP) payments for infertility treatment. This protocol outlines the methodological approach and analytical process to appraise the extent of economic burden due to payments for infertility care services in LMICs. METHOD AND ANALYSIS: Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses approach, we will primarily search for articles indexed in PubMed, Web of Science, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature, EconLit and PsycINFO databases. Grey literature from relevant organisations' virtual libraries shall also be searched. Backward and forward searches on the articles selected will also be done. Quantitative studies on infertility treatment costs from LMICs across the world regions within the last 20 years will be considered. The primary outcome of interest shall include OOP payments, catastrophic health expenditure and direct costs for infertility services. Conversely, informal payments and indirect costs related to infertility treatments shall be considered as secondary outcomes. Integrated quality Criteria for Review Of Multiple Study designs will be used to assess the quality of the studies included in the review. Meta-analysis shall be considered if sufficient studies identified are homogenous in characteristics. Also, the review shall analyse the average cost of infertility treatment against the respective countries' economic indicators like gross domestic product per capita if data permit. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Research and ethics approval will not be required given this will be a review of published articles on the subject. The findings shall be disseminated through publication in a peer-reviewed journal and presentation to the WHO and its partners. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020199312.

Indexed as

Developing CountriesInfertilityHumansIncomePovertyResearch DesignSystematic Reviews as Topichealth economicsreproductive medicinesubfertility

Identifiers

PMID33172951
PMCPMC7656943
OpenAlexW3098786900

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.