Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33172942›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

Prevalence and predictors of gestational diabetes mellitus in rural Assam: a cross-sectional study using mobile medical units.

Subrata Chanda, Vishal Dogra, Najeeb Hazarika, Hardeep Bambrah, Ajit Kisanrao Sudke, Anupa Vig, Shailendra Kumar Hegde

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Screening for gestational diabetes, Ahmedabad, India.Bulletin of the World Health Organization · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Diabetic retinopathy in pregnancy - A review.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2021
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Gestational Diabetes Mellitus - The Modern Indian Perspective.Indian journal of endocrinology and metabolism
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Subrata ChandaClinical Domain, Piramal Swasthya Management and Reseach Institute, Guwahati, Assam, India.
Vishal DograResearch and Analysis Wing, Piramal Swasthya Management and Reseach Institute, Hyderabad, Telangana, India vani1825@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-9725-5699
Najeeb HazarikaAssam and North East State Office, Piramal Swasthya Management and Reseach Institute, Guwahati, Assam, India.
Hardeep BambrahAssam and North East State Office, Piramal Swasthya Management and Reseach Institute, Guwahati, Assam, India.
Ajit Kisanrao SudkeClinical Domain, Piramal Swasthya Management and Reseach Institute, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Anupa VigClinical Domain, Piramal Swasthya Management and Reseach Institute, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Shailendra Kumar HegdeInnovations, Piramal Swasthya Management and Reseach Institute, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Piramal (India) · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine the prevalence and predictors of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) in rural Assam, India using a network of Mobile Medical Units. STUDY

designA field-based cross-sectional study. SETTINGS: Rural areas of Assam state, India.

participantsA total of 1410 pregnant women in gestational age of 24-28 weeks

interventionIdentification of pregnant women in 24-28 weeks of pregnancy from villages and administering them Government of India recommended oral glucose tolerance test for GDM confirmation. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Presence of gestational diabetes among pregnant women, risk factors and predictors of GDM.

resultsA total of 1212 pregnant women underwent the oral glucose tolerance test. One hundred and ninety-eight women were ineligible due to existing chronic diseases or very high blood glucose level before the test. The overall GDM prevalence in Assam was 16.67% (95% CI 14.61% to 18.89%). Women aged 26-30 years (adjusted odds ratio, aOR 1.70; CI 1.14 to 2.52), who passed 10th class (aOR 1.58; CI 1.05 to 2.37), belonging to Muslim religion (aOR 1.52; 95% CI 1.05 to 2.21) and above poverty line (aOR 1.38; 95% CI 1.00 to 1.91) had significantly increased likelihood of developing GDM compared with respective baseline groups (p<0.05). Body mass index, gravida and being non-anaemic were non-significant risk factors for GDM. Family history of diabetes (aOR 1.82; 95% CI 1.08 to 3.06) and smoking (aOR 1.61; 95% CI 1.10 to 2.35) were significant and independent predictors of GDM.

conclusionThe prevalence of GDM in rural Assam is high. The mobile medical units may play a significant role in the implementation of GDM screening, diagnosis, treatment to ensure better maternal and foetal health outcomes in rural Assam.

Indexed as

Diabetes, GestationalAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGlucose Tolerance TestHumansIndiaInfantPregnancyPrevalenceRisk Factorsdiabetes in pregnancyepidemiologyprimary care

Identifiers

PMID33172942
PMCPMC7656912
OpenAlexW3103679895

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.