Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33172461›Full record

ArticleBMC palliative care2020

Introducing cross-cultural education in palliative care: focus groups with experts on practical strategies.

Imane Semlali, Emmanuel Tamches, Pascal Singy, Orest Weber

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC palliative care, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Imane SemlaliLiaison Psychiatry Service, Department of Psychiatry, Lausanne University Hospital, Av. de Beaumont 23, 1011, Lausanne, Switzerland. imane.semlali@chuv.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3349-1363
Emmanuel TamchesPalliative & Supportive Care Service, Lausanne University Hospital, Av. Pierre-Decker 5, 1011, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Pascal SingyLiaison Psychiatry Service, Department of Psychiatry, Lausanne University Hospital, Av. de Beaumont 23, 1011, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Orest WeberLiaison Psychiatry Service, Department of Psychiatry, Lausanne University Hospital, Av. de Beaumont 23, 1011, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Hôpital de Beaumont · CHUniversity of Lausanne · CH

Funding

Schweizerische Akademie der Medizinischen Wissenschaften PC 12/17
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe linguistic and cultural diversity found in European societies creates specific challenges to palliative care clinicians. Patients' heterogeneous habits, beliefs and social situations, and in many cases language barriers, add complexity to clinicians' work. Cross-cultural teaching helps palliative care specialists deal with issues that arise from such diversity. This study aimed to provide interested educators and decision makers with ideas for how to implement cross-cultural training in palliative care.

methodsWe conducted four focus groups in French- and Italian-speaking Switzerland. All groups consisted of a mix of experts in palliative care and/or cross-cultural teaching. The interdisciplinary research team submitted the data for thematic content analysis.

resultsFocus-group participants saw a clear need for courses addressing cross-cultural issues in end-of-life care, including in medical disciplines outside of palliative care (e.g. geriatrics, oncology, intensive care). We found that these courses should be embedded in existing training offerings and should appear at all stages of curricula for end-of-life specialists. Two trends emerged related to course content. One focuses on clinicians' acquisition of cultural expertise and tools allowing them to deal with complex situations on their own; the other stresses the importance of clinicians' reflections and learning to collaborate with other professionals in complex situations. These trends evoke recent debates in the literature: the quest for expertise and tools is related to traditional twentieth century work on cross-cultural competence, whereas reflection and collaboration are central to more recent research that promotes cultural sensitivity and humility in clinicians.

conclusionThis study offers new insights into cross-cultural courses in palliative and end-of-life care. Basic knowledge on culture in medicine, variable practices related to death and dying, communication techniques, self-reflection on cultural references and aptitude for interprofessional collaboration are central to preparing clinicians in end-of-life settings to work with linguistically and culturally diverse patients.

Indexed as

AdultAttitude of Health PersonnelCulturally Competent CareFemaleFocus GroupsHealth PersonnelHumansMalePalliative CareQualitative ResearchSwitzerlandCommunicationCross-cultural trainingCultural competenceCultural sensitivityPalliative care

Identifiers

PMID33172461
PMCPMC7656760
OpenAlexW3105549192

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.