Observational studyBMC medical education2020
The effect of supplemental high Fidelity simulation training in medical students.
Observational study in BMC medical education, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- High and low-fidelity simulation for respiratory diseases pediatric training: a prospective and randomized study.Jornal de pediatriaTrial
- Assessment of ChatGPT-5 as an Artificial Intelligence Tool for Exploring Emerging Dimensions of Clinical Simulation: A Proof-of-concept Study.Journal of medical systems · 2026Article
- Review
- Analysis of high-fidelity simulation effects and their connection with educational practices in early nursing education.BMC nursing · 2025Article
- Effect of scenario-supported training on pediatric nurses' knowledge and skills in extravasation and infiltration management.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Article
- The Room of Errors as an Innovative Simulated Environment to Enhance the Management of Blood Exposure Accidents: A Tunisian Pre-Experimental Study.Advances in medical education and practice · 2025Article
- A 3D-Printed High-Fidelity Bronchial Tree for Bronchoscopy.Respiratory care · 2023Article
- Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Neonatal Nursing Practicum and Extended Reality Simulation Training Needs: A Descriptive and Cross-Sectional Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- An Alternative to Traditional Bedside Teaching During COVID-19: High-Fidelity Simulation-Based Study.JMIR medical education · 2022Article
- Simulation-based training in asthma exacerbation for medical students: effect of prior exposure to simulation training on performance.BMC medical education · 2022Observational
- Efficacy of the Gulu University Reproductive Health Simulation Training for final year medical students and interns: a before-and-after study.Therapeutic advances in reproductive healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSimulation-based education (SBE) with high-fidelity simulation (HFS) offers medical students early exposure to the clinical environment, allowing development of clinical scenarios and management. We hypothesized that supplementation of standard pulmonary physiology curriculum with HFS would improve the performance of first-year medical students on written tests of pulmonary physiology.
methodsThis observational pilot study included SBE with three HFS scenarios of patient care that highlighted basic pulmonary physiology. First-year medical students' test scores of their cardio-pulmonary curriculum were compared between students who participated in SBE versus only lecture-based education (LBE). A survey was administered to the SBE group to assess their perception of the HFS.
resultsFrom a class of 188 first-year medical students, 89 (47%) participated in the SBE and the remaining 99 were considered as the LBE group. On their cardio-pulmonary curriculum test, the SBE group had a median score of 106 [IQR: 97,110] and LBE group of 99 [IQR: 89,105] (p < 0.001). For the pulmonary physiology subsection, scores were also significantly different between groups (p < 0.001).
conclusionsImplementation of supplemental SBE could be an adequate technique to improve learning enhancement and overall satisfaction in preclinical medical students.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.