Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33172441›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2020

Medical identity; perspectives of students from two countries.

Conor Gilligan, Teresa Loda, Florian Junne, Stephan Zipfel, Brian Kelly, Graeme Horton, Anne Herrmann-Werner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Conor GilliganSchool of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia.
Teresa LodaMedical Department VI/Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Tuebingen, Osianderstr. 5, D-72076, Tuebingen, Germany. teresa.loda@med.uni-tuebingen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1450-1757
Florian JunneMedical Department VI/Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Tuebingen, Osianderstr. 5, D-72076, Tuebingen, Germany.
Stephan ZipfelMedical Department VI/Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Tuebingen, Osianderstr. 5, D-72076, Tuebingen, Germany.
Brian KellySchool of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia.
Graeme HortonSchool of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia.
Anne Herrmann-WernerMedical Department VI/Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Tuebingen, Osianderstr. 5, D-72076, Tuebingen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe development of professional identity is a fundamental element of medical education. There is evidence that in Germany, students' perceptions of the ideal and real doctor differ, and that of themselves as physicians falls between these constructs. We sought to compare students' perceptions of themselves, the ideal doctor, and the 'real' doctor and investigate differences from first to final year in the relationships between these constructs, as well as differences between Australian and German cohorts.

methodStudents in the first and final years of their medical program at one Australian and one German university were invited to complete the Osgood and Hofstatter polarity profile, involving the description of their mental image of the ideal and real doctor, and the doctor they hope to become, with adjectives provided.

resultsOne hundred sixty-seven students completed the survey in Australia (121 year 1, 46 year 5) and 188 in Germany (164 year 1, 24 year 6). The perception of the ideal doctor was consistent across all respondents, but that of the real doctor and self-image differed between country and year. Differences existed between country cohorts in perceptions of 'confidence', 'strength', 'capability' and 'security'.

conclusionsThe pattern previously reported among German students was maintained, but a different pattern emerged among Australian students. Differences between countries could reflect cultural differences or variations in the overt and hidden curricula of medical schools. Some of the constructs within the profiles are amenable to educational interventions to improve students' confidence and sense of capability.

Indexed as

Education, Medical, UndergraduateStudents, MedicalAustraliaCurriculumGermanyHumansSchools, MedicalSurveys and QuestionnairesDoctorIdentityMedical curriculumMedical students

Identifiers

PMID33172441
PMCPMC7654572

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.