Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33172440›Full record

ReviewBMC cancer2020

Improving outcomes after autologous transplantation in relapsed/refractory Hodgkin lymphoma: a European expert perspective.

Anna Sureda, Marc André, Peter Borchmann, Maria G da Silva, Christian Gisselbrecht, Theodoros P Vassilakopoulos, Pier Luigi Zinzani, Jan Walewski

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMC cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 8 institutions in 8 countries.

Anna SuredaHematology Department, Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Programme, Institut Català d'Oncologia-Hospital Duran i Reynals, Gran Via de l'Hospitalet, 199 - 203, 08908, Barcelona, Spain. asureda@iconcologia.net.
Marc AndréDepartment of Hematology, Université catholique de Louvain, CHU UCL Namur, Yvoir, Belgium.
Peter BorchmannDepartment of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Maria G da SilvaDepartment of Hematology, Instituto Português de Oncologia - Francisco Gentil, Lisbon, Portugal.
Christian GisselbrechtInstitut d'Hématologie, Hôpital Saint Louis, Paris, France.
Theodoros P VassilakopoulosDepartment of Haematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Laikon General Hospital, Athens, Greece.
Pier Luigi ZinzaniAzienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Jan WalewskiDepartment of Lymphoid Malignancies, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Institute Oncology Center, Warszawa, Poland.
Azienda USL di Bologna · ITHôpital Saint-Louis · FRInstitut d'Investigació Biomédica de Bellvitge · ESInstituto Português de Oncologia Francisco Gentil · PTNational and Kapodistrian University of Athens · GRThe Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology · PLUCLouvain · BEUniversity Hospital Cologne · DE

Funding

Millennium Pharmaceuticals Inc. N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is a well-established approach to treatment of patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) recommended by both the European Society for Medical Oncology and the National Comprehensive Cancer Network based on the results from randomized controlled studies. However, a considerable number of patients who receive ASCT will progress/relapse and display suboptimal post-transplant outcomes. Over recent years, a number of different strategies have been assessed to improve post-ASCT outcomes and augment HL cure rates. These include use of pre- and post-ASCT salvage therapies and post-ASCT consolidative therapy, with the greatest benefits demonstrated by targeted therapies, such as brentuximab vedotin. However, adoption of these new approaches has been inconsistent across different centers and regions. In this article, we provide a European perspective on the available treatment options and likely future developments in the salvage and consolidation settings, with the aim to improve management of patients with HL who have a high risk of post-ASCT failure.

conclusionsWe conclude that early intervention with post-ASCT consolidation improves outcomes in patients with R/R HL who require ASCT. Future approvals of targeted agents are expected to further improve outcomes and provide additional treatment options in the coming age of personalized medicine.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, NeoplasmSalvage TherapyAntineoplastic AgentsHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationHodgkin DiseaseHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPrognosisSurvival RateTransplantation, AutologousAntineoplastic AgentsConsolidationHLSalvageStem cell transplantation

Identifiers

PMID33172440
PMCPMC7657361
OpenAlexW3104013189

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.